illustration: DALL-EThe Widoczni agency has prepared a list of women worth following on LinkedIn in search of inspiration, reliable knowledge, and proven business practices. Based on the Ranking of Polish Marketing Personalities, 35 experts were selected who achieved the highest score in the agency`s proprietary index - WidoczniScore.
The list was compiled together with the Institute for Media Monitoring, which provided in-depth data on the strength and reach of the featured leaders` personal brands. The following indicators were taken into account: number of publications, reach, advertising value equivalency (AVE), number of high-exposure publications, and the number of publications in industry media.
Who rules on LinkedIn?
As a result of the cooperation between IMM and Widoczni, a list was created of experts who actively and regularly share knowledge in the field of marketing and business, and whose personal brands are strongly visible in the industry media.
- The leader of the list in terms of the number of followers on LinkedIn is Monika Smulewicz, managing director of Eduwersum Collegium of HR Development and founder of the HR na Szpilkach blog, who is followed by nearly 72.5 thousand people on the platform.
- Second place went to Natalia Bogdan, headhunter and founder of the Jobhouse employment agency, with 63.2 thousand followers.
- The podium is closed by Sylwia Królikowska - psychologist, business trainer, and author, known as the "Supernanny of Leaders," followed by almost 44.5 thousand users.
The highest WidoczniScore, which is the Widoczni agency`s proprietary criterion and represents a subjective assessment of a given person`s creative output, was awarded to Joanna Malinowska-Parzydło (33 points) - the author of the Polish term "marka osobista" (personal brand), a pioneer of personal branding in Poland, and creator of the book "Jesteś marką" (You Are a Brand). In second place was Anna Ledwoń-Blacha (31 points) - marketer, co-creator, and organizer of CRASH Mondays events. Following her, Angelika Chimkowska, Kama Kotowska, Dagmara Pakulska, and Monika Smulewicz tied for third (with 30 points each).
And who in the media?
- The expert who was most frequently visible in classic media (press, radio, television, and internet portals) and social media is Monika Smulewicz (over 1,600 publications in total).
- Second place in terms of the number of media publications was won by Natalia Hatalska - trend researcher, CEO, and founder of Infuture.institute (over 1,300 publications).
- Third position in this ranking, with 762 publications, was secured by Dominika Bucholc, strategist and expert in the field of new technologies.
Natalia Hatalska boasts the largest media reach. In her case, the number of potential contacts with media messages amounted to over 14.8 million, which means that a statistical person over the age of 15 could have encountered information mentioning her an average of 2 times over the past year. The second position belongs to Monika Smulewicz (over 13.6 million). Third place was taken by Janina Bąk, statistician, book author, and creator of the Janina Daily blog (nearly 8 million).
Natalia Hatalska is also the leader of the ranking considering the Advertising Value Equivalency (AVE), which in her case was estimated at nearly 12 million PLN. In the second position of this list was Agata Chmielewska, e-commerce & UX Consultant, with a result of over 6.4 million PLN, and the third position belongs to Róża Szafranek, founder of the HR Hints agency (nearly 5 million PLN).

In terms of the number of publications in industry media, Anna Ledwoń-Blacha won with 79 materials. In second place was Katarzyna Dworzyńska, founder and CEO of the PR Calling agency and vice president of the Association of PR Companies (58 publications). Third place went to Dagmara Pakulska, social media trainer (44 publications).
Most valuable exposure
Regarding the number of high-exposure publications—the most valuable materials appearing in the most visible places:
- first place was taken by Dominika Bucholc with 315 publications.
- Second place in this category was won by Kamila Kierzek-Mechło - B2B strategist and marketer specializing in new technologies and the use of AI in business, and managing director of BUZZcenter (249 messages).
- In third position was Natalia Hatalska with 143 publications.
"Building a personal brand has become one of the essential elements of functioning in marketing and business today. More and more experts are consciously developing their brand on LinkedIn, among other ways by sharing knowledge, which in turn translates into their presence across the entire media space. The leaders of the list regularly comment on market changes, which makes them frequently quoted by journalists in the context of important industry topics," indicates Monika Ezman, managing director of Services at IMM, in a comment for the PRoto.pl portal. "Media monitoring data shows which experts are shaping the debate on business and marketing. Numbers have the advantage of showing influence in a measurable way. This also applies to the assessment of the media strength of a personal brand."
Detailed information about the list is available on the Widoczni agency website.
Methodology:
The IMM analysis was conducted based on messages in Polish press, radio, television, internet portals, and social media published between January 1 and December 31, 2025. The number of followers on LinkedIn is as of March 6, 2026.
Reach informs about the number of potential contacts with a media message. The indicator is developed based on the viewership and listenership of radio and television programs, press readership, the average number of views of internet materials—taking into account the exposure coefficient of proper names in the content—and the organic reach of social media channels.
COMMERCIAL BREAK
New articles in section Media industry
New generations and the end of traditional news. Reuters Institute report
Krzysztof Fiedorek
Traditional news media are losing touch with the youngest generation of audiences, who grew up in a digital environment. Young people aged 18 to 24 spend time online continuously and expect publishers to take a fresh approach to presenting reality, according to a report by the Reuters Institute.
TVs in Europe, the USA and China. What and how we watch on them
Paweł Sobczak
The Living Room Study shows significant differences in video content consumption across different regions of the world. This is the result of diverse media ecosystems shaped by decades of local broadcasting, channel availability, and strong cultural factors.
Cinema in the era of algorithms and AI
Arkadiusz Murenia
Will artificial intelligence kill the creativity of filmmakers? The most honest answer is: no, AI is unlikely to kill the creativity of filmmakers, but it will very clearly change the place where this creativity manifests itself and, above all, how.
See articles on a similar topic:
Television 2025. Report by the European Broadcasting Union
Krzysztof Fiedorek
Europeans are watching less and less television. In 2024, the average viewing time was 3 hours and 13 minutes per day. Only 54% of young people had any contact with TV, and public broadcasters held a 23% share. Television is losing relevance, especially among the youngest viewers.
Online News Portal Readers in Poland. Loyalty Analysis
Bartłomiej Dwornik
Among news portals, Onet has the highest number of users. However, in terms of reader loyalty, it falls behind Wirtualna Polska. When looking specifically at news readers, Gazeta takes the lead, though it ranks poorly in Google search positioning.
How the Media Talk (or Stay Silent) About Climate. Reuters Institute Report
Krzysztof Fiedorek
Although climate change is becoming increasingly noticeable worldwide, the media have failed to maintain growing interest in the topic. The report "Climate Change and News Audiences 2024" shows that audience engagement with climate topics has remained almost unchanged for several years.
Milgram Experiment 2023. AI Can Encourage Violence
KrzysztoF
Researchers from SWPS University replicated the famous Milgram experiment, in which participants were instructed to inflict pain on another person under the authority’s command. This time, the authority was a robot. It’s the first study showing that people are willing to harm another person when a robot commands them to do so.




























