po polsku
source: PBCThe study, conducted by GFK and Kantar Millward Brown, used eye-tracking technology on 300 respondents, both regular print readers and non-readers. It analyzed ad reception in:
- daily newspapers
- and luxury women’s magazines.
The study focused on so-called long fixations, or gazes at an ad lasting more than 180 milliseconds. It also measured emotional engagement, indicated by pupil dilation.
- The number of fixations (over 180 ms) on contextual print ads is 67% higher,
- the average gaze duration on contextual ads is 30% longer than on standard ads,
- emotional engagement with contextual ads is 44% higher.
The results also showed that regular readers engage more with ad content than non-readers. However, the study’s main conclusion is the same for both groups: contextual advertising in print media is more effective, and print itself conveys a more complex marketing message.
The study also compared print advertising results with those of online ads. Both print readers and non-readers were more receptive to print ads.
Number of Fixations on Ads
- 4.1 - print ad (readers)
- 3.7 - print ad (non-readers)
- 2.9 - online ad (readers)
- 2.8 - online ad (non-readers)
- The difference of one fixation is a significant difference - emphasizes Waldemar Izdebski, president of Polskie Badania Czytelnictwa, commenting on the study results on the PBC website. - Print advertising allows readers to notice one more element of the ad.
More details about the study results are available on the Polskie Badania Czytelnictwa website.
COMMERCIAL BREAK
New articles in section Marketing and PR
What affects our purchasing decisions? The KONSUMER 2026 study
Michał Mystkowski, Berry Kolektyw Kreatywny
Grandma watches TikTok before sleep. A father in his fifties types into Google "will AI take my job?" A thirty-year-old woman postpones having a child but buys a weekend trip "to take a breath for a moment". A twelve-year-old asks ChatGPT about a dream job and tries to convince parents to buy another game skin.
Rules of SEO in the AI era. The end of FAQ rich results and spam
Sandra Kluza, Harbingers
Google is increasingly distancing itself from AI hacks and reminding us that quality content, technical site availability, and user utility remain the foundation of visibility. AI Search does not replace SEO.
Data analysis. Warning signs and technical debt
Aleksander Pawzun, CalmFox.pl
Until a few years ago, a classic data warehouse, overnight processing, and reports available in the morning were a sign of organizational maturity. Today, in many companies, these same solutions have become an invisible constraint.
See articles on a similar topic:
Do Ads on TV Annoy You? Think Again, It’s Quite the Opposite!
Bartłomiej Dwornik
Advertisements don’t irritate viewers; instead, they increase the appeal of television programs, according to research published in the Polish edition of Harvard Business Review. Viewers are actually willing to pay more for shows they watched with ad breaks.
Artificial Intelligence and Marketing. Industry Expectations and Concerns
KrzysztoF
Marketers using generative artificial intelligence see its potential but also perceive risks. The Generative AI Snapshot Series survey conducted by Salesforce and YouGov shows that the industry expects significant changes - and soon.
When a Review Lies. The Growing Threat of Fake Opinions Online
KFi
Popularity of digital marketplaces rises, so does a less welcome trend: fake reviews. These manipulated opinions distort product rankings and mislead consumers, all while unfairly disadvantaging honest businesses. And despite regulatory efforts, the problem is far from solved.
Dietary Supplements. How Products Masquerading as Medications are Sold
Ewa Zygadło-Kozaczuk
Colorful packaging entices us with miraculous health benefits, and we buy them, hoping for a fit body, good sleep, great mood, and excellent sex. But do we know what lies behind that magical pill, capsule, or syrup? Are we aware that these advertised products are merely masquerading as medications?
