po polsku
source: PBCThe study, conducted by GFK and Kantar Millward Brown, used eye-tracking technology on 300 respondents, both regular print readers and non-readers. It analyzed ad reception in:
- daily newspapers
- and luxury women’s magazines.
The study focused on so-called long fixations, or gazes at an ad lasting more than 180 milliseconds. It also measured emotional engagement, indicated by pupil dilation.
- The number of fixations (over 180 ms) on contextual print ads is 67% higher,
- the average gaze duration on contextual ads is 30% longer than on standard ads,
- emotional engagement with contextual ads is 44% higher.
The results also showed that regular readers engage more with ad content than non-readers. However, the study’s main conclusion is the same for both groups: contextual advertising in print media is more effective, and print itself conveys a more complex marketing message.
The study also compared print advertising results with those of online ads. Both print readers and non-readers were more receptive to print ads.
Number of Fixations on Ads
- 4.1 - print ad (readers)
- 3.7 - print ad (non-readers)
- 2.9 - online ad (readers)
- 2.8 - online ad (non-readers)
- The difference of one fixation is a significant difference - emphasizes Waldemar Izdebski, president of Polskie Badania Czytelnictwa, commenting on the study results on the PBC website. - Print advertising allows readers to notice one more element of the ad.
More details about the study results are available on the Polskie Badania Czytelnictwa website.
COMMERCIAL BREAK
New articles in section Marketing and PR
What affects our purchasing decisions? The KONSUMER 2026 study
Michał Mystkowski, Berry Kolektyw Kreatywny
Grandma watches TikTok before sleep. A father in his fifties types into Google "will AI take my job?" A thirty-year-old woman postpones having a child but buys a weekend trip "to take a breath for a moment". A twelve-year-old asks ChatGPT about a dream job and tries to convince parents to buy another game skin.
Rules of SEO in the AI era. The end of FAQ rich results and spam
Sandra Kluza, Harbingers
Google is increasingly distancing itself from AI hacks and reminding us that quality content, technical site availability, and user utility remain the foundation of visibility. AI Search does not replace SEO.
Data analysis. Warning signs and technical debt
Aleksander Pawzun, CalmFox.pl
Until a few years ago, a classic data warehouse, overnight processing, and reports available in the morning were a sign of organizational maturity. Today, in many companies, these same solutions have become an invisible constraint.
See articles on a similar topic:
Artificial Intelligence, Real Results in Marketing. HubSpot Report
BARD
Although AI is a term that can sometimes evoke concerns, the "AI Trends Report 2024" compiled by analysts at HubSpot shows that for many, artificial intelligence is the future of marketing.
Dietary Supplements. How Products Masquerading as Medications are Sold
Ewa Zygadło-Kozaczuk
Colorful packaging entices us with miraculous health benefits, and we buy them, hoping for a fit body, good sleep, great mood, and excellent sex. But do we know what lies behind that magical pill, capsule, or syrup? Are we aware that these advertised products are merely masquerading as medications?
A Socially Responsible Company. This Image Pays Off
RINF
Poles and Spaniards are the most likely in Europe to buy from socially responsible companies, according to the Global State of the Consumer Tracker report, developed in late June by Deloitte’s consulting experts.
Brand visibility in the age of algorithms
Aleksander Pawzun
A few years ago, everything was simpler. It was enough to have a good website, do SEO, run a blog, and publish on social media. Whoever was systematic was visible. Whoever invested in content and positioning gained customers. That world no longer exists.
