illustration: DALL-EYouTube has introduced a major update to its analytics system, shifting away from the long-used “returning viewers” metric. Instead, the platform now categorizes audiences into three distinct types, providing creators and brands with a more nuanced understanding of their community. The change, rolled out in YouTube Studio, aims to spotlight viewer loyalty and long-term engagement over fleeting success or raw view counts.
According to YouTube’s new model, viewers now fall into three categories:
- New viewers: Those visiting a channel for the first time during a selected period.
- Casual viewers: People who have watched content from a channel irregularly over the past year - between one and five months.
- Regular viewers: The most valuable group, made up of those who have watched content from the channel for at least six of the past 12 months.
This reclassification marks a strategic pivot toward understanding not just how many people a video reaches, but who keeps coming back. Brands, advertisers, and creators can now assess a channel’s true community impact, instead of relying on subscription numbers or one-off viral spikes.
Loyalty, not virality
In the words of Borys Marushchak, Performance Manager at Harbingers, the change allows marketers to “precisely assess audience loyalty” and differentiate between genuine community-building and short-term reach. For companies looking to partner with creators, the share of regular viewers may now matter more than subscriber counts.
See video: 7 facts about news on social media
To support creators in building viewer loyalty, YouTube has updated its platform recommendations. The new suggestions include:
- Maintaining a consistent upload schedule
- Using the Community tab for informal posts and polls
- Actively engaging with comments
- Hosting livestreams and video premieres
These practices aim to turn casual or new viewers into regulars. A signal not just of creator success, but also of sustainable channel growth. Example: A cooking channel with 100,000 subscribers but only 3% regular viewers may be less attractive to brands than a niche channel with 20,000 subscribers and 25% regular engagement. The latter suggests a tightly-knit audience that values the creator’s content long-term.
| Viewer Type | Frequency of Visits (12 months) | Engagement Value |
|---|---|---|
| New viewers | First-time visits | Discovery |
| Casual viewers | 1-5 months | Moderate |
| Regular viewers | 6+ months | High |
This detailed breakdown enables more informed content strategy decisions. Creators can now track whether their videos fail to convert first-time viewers into loyal followers - and adjust accordingly.
Before the update, the single "returning viewers" metric grouped casual and loyal users together. Now, the distinction reveals whether a channel’s success relies on novelty or lasting impact.
Social video dominates news and trust
The move also reflects broader industry shifts. According to the Reuters Digital News Report 2025, 30% of internet users identify YouTube as their primary news source. Social video consumption has soared, growing from 52% in 2020 to 65% in 2025.
- 52% → 65%: global increase in social video news consumption
- 55% → 72%: Americans watching news videos weekly
- 61%: viewers prefer platforms like YouTube over traditional news sites
- 67% → 75%: global growth in any kind of video news viewing
These numbers show why platforms like YouTube want better tools to measure true influence. Brands investing in creator partnerships care less about viral hits and more about stable audiences.
After all, according to a trust study by IBRiS, YouTube is also the most trusted social platform in Poland. Nearly 25% of respondents declared trust in the platform, and only 3% said they didn’t know it. Meanwhile, 41.6% of global users still judge content credibility by popularity - likes and views - a concerning insight from UNESCO`s Influencer 2024 Report.
This behavior emphasizes why metrics like regular viewer share are so important. They reflect real relationships between creator and audience, not just algorithm-fueled attention.
In the new YouTube ecosystem, engagement is currency. Viewers who return month after month now speak louder than subscriber milestones or trending appearances.
COMMERCIAL BREAK
New articles in section Media industry
Health disinformation on the internet. Diagnosis from an algorithm
Katarzyna Czechowicz
Health disinformation can cause a cancer patient to see a doctor when it is too late for effective treatment. It can also undermine trust in doctors and public institutions. As a result, people may refuse to cooperate even during a real external threat, experts warn.
Feminatives are not a given. How Polish women talk about their professions
SWPS
Polish women still rarely use female job titles. This comes from the latest report by the Center for Research on Social Relations at SWPS University. Women's professional activity proved to be a significant factor in using feminatives.
Who trusts articles written by artificial intelligence? Results of a study from China
Krzysztof Fiedorek
Young readers trust machines more than human writers. When they consume news, they prefer the cool objectivity of algorithms over human emotions. They believe that articles created by AI are objective. As they interact with these texts more frequently, they rarely notice any harmful biases in them.
See articles on a similar topic:
Most medical influencer posts on TikTok are FALSE
KFi
Researchers from East Carolina University Health Medical Center analysed 120 TikTok videos tagged with hashtags such as #naturalparenting, #antivaccine, and #holistichealth. The results of their study leave no doubt.
Russian Propaganda. Debunk.org Report on Moscow's Disinformation Scale
BARD, PAP Mediaroom
In 2022, the Russian Federation allocated approximately 143 billion rubles to mass media (equivalent to 1.9 billion US dollars), exceeding the planned budget by 25%. For the current year, the Kremlin's budget for this sector is set at 119.2 billion rubles (1.6 billion dollars).
Influencers Earn Too Much. No Fluff Jobs Report
KrzysztoF
According to nearly 70% of Poles, influencers earn too much, and 54% feel the least affection for them out of all professions. Only politicians receive equally low regard among respondents surveyed by No Fluff Jobs. On the other hand, nurses and… farmers are considered underpaid.
Fake News and Disinformation in Poland. Scale, Impact and Future
Bartłomiej Dwornik
Where do the sources of disinformation lie, and how large is the scale of this wave? Why are we so susceptible to false information, and what role do traditional media play in this puzzle? Let’s shed some light on these issues and face the question: can the battle against the flood of disinformation still be won?




























