illustration: DALL-EAlthough Generation Alpha is growing up in the era of digital openness and unlimited access to information, the report "Gen Alpha Unfiltered" by GWI (formerly GlobalWebIndex) clearly shows: children aged 8-15 increasingly avoid content that triggers fear, stress or a sense of being overwhelmed. The numbers show not only the scale of this trend but also specific directions - from formats to content choices and the tone of communication.
In the GWI-cited study, as many as 15% of adults aged 16-64 admitted to actively avoiding political topics because they affect their well-being. For Generation Alpha, the scale has not yet been measured numerically, but the authors note that children react similarly - not verbally, but through behavioral changes.
See video: 7 facts about news on social media
According to the GWI report, although children see the same content as adults, and platforms do not differentiate by age and algorithms suggest similar materials to everyone, Generation Alpha, instead of controversy, clicks on games, entertainment, and humor. This shows that even the youngest internet users make conscious choices - limiting what negatively affects their emotions.
Games, movies and podcasts. Real preferences by age group
The report splits children`s preferences into two main age groups: 8-11 years and 12-15 years. The data clearly shows that younger users go for even lighter formats than their older peers.
| Age | Most chosen content | Preferred format |
|---|---|---|
| 8-11 years | Mobile games, cartoons, unboxings | Short video (up to 1 min) |
| 12-15 years | Podcasts, vlogs, comedy | Videos up to 15 minutes |
Format matters a lot. Short attention spans make kids avoid longer formats - not just because they’re "boring", but because they expose them too long to hard topics.
Dominance of light content. 5 most common Gen Alpha picks
The report also includes five of the most popular content categories that children prefer on social platforms. These figures reflect preferences among 8-15-year-olds (based on responses from both children and parents):
- 53% - games and online play
- 46% - humor and jokes (including memes, gags, comedy sketches)
- 39% - vlogs and daily stories from influencers
- 34% - tutorials and life hacks in video form
- 29% - educational content (focused on fun facts, not school topics)
Importantly, only 12% of children said they are interested in world news - including politics, social issues, or the climate. That’s over four times less than for comedy content.
TikTok instead of textbooks and "Humor as therapy"
The report also shows that kids look for life answers not in books, but on social media. When asked where they most often learn about the world:
- 41% answered: TikTok
- 37% - YouTube
- 22% - search engines (Google)
- 15% - school
- 7% - parents or siblings
This means that 78% of knowledge comes from short videos or search engines. Traditional education channels - school and family - lose to platforms that are fast and emotional.
The report’s authors describe humor as a way to cope with emotional overload. Although they don’t provide exact numbers on children’s stress levels, it’s worth noting the data on time spent watching comedy:
- children aged 8-11 spend an average of 4.2 hours per week watching funny videos
- children aged 12-15 - 3.8 hours per week
That’s more than they spend on educational and informational content combined. So humor works not only as entertainment but also as daily protection against stress.
* * *
Data for the "Gen Alpha Unfiltered" report was collected in February 2024 by GWI through an online survey involving 19,307 children aged 8-15 from 17 countries. The study was conducted with parental or guardian consent and supervision, and the survey content was reviewed by experts in child psychology and education. The full report is available at gwi.com.
COMMERCIAL BREAK
New articles in section Media industry
Video market in Asia. Traditional media companies in retreat
KFi
The Asian video market will reach a value of 15 billion dollars. Investments are moving to streaming and cinema. Sports broadcasts and local films drive growth. Media Partners Asia presented the report "Asia Video Content Dynamics 2026".
Information laundering. Russian propaganda returns as news from China
KFi
Russian intelligence agencies use complex tactics to mask the primary source of their harmful narratives. Patrycja Krzyśpiak from NASK details this dangerous process of information laundering in a recent report.
Health disinformation on the internet. Diagnosis from an algorithm
Katarzyna Czechowicz
Health disinformation can cause a cancer patient to see a doctor when it is too late for effective treatment. It can also undermine trust in doctors and public institutions. As a result, people may refuse to cooperate even during a real external threat, experts warn.
See articles on a similar topic:
New generations and the end of traditional news. Reuters Institute report
Krzysztof Fiedorek
Traditional news media are losing touch with the youngest generation of audiences, who grew up in a digital environment. Young people aged 18 to 24 spend time online continuously and expect publishers to take a fresh approach to presenting reality, according to a report by the Reuters Institute.
Repression Against Media: Committee to Protect Journalists Report for 2024
Krzysztof Fiedorek
In 2024, at least 361 journalists worldwide were imprisoned, often for exposing the truth. In China, reporters are tracked using advanced facial recognition systems, in Israel, Palestinian journalists are jailed without trial, and in Myanmar, journalist Shin Daewe received a life sentence for... a drone.
New Technologies in Journalism. PressInstitute Study
BARD
Nearly 39% of journalists use their smartphone or tablet camera to record videos, while over 26% use the built-in camera to take photos that they later publish, according to the "Journalists and New Technologies" study by PressInstitute.
Who trusts articles written by artificial intelligence? Results of a study from China
Krzysztof Fiedorek
Young readers trust machines more than human writers. When they consume news, they prefer the cool objectivity of algorithms over human emotions. They believe that articles created by AI are objective. As they interact with these texts more frequently, they rarely notice any harmful biases in them.




























