menu
Weekly Online Magazine
ISSN 2544-5839
zamknij
MediaHisttory Podcast image

19.05.2025 Media industry

Algorithmic personalization study. Who and how understands digital media

KFi

Most internet users believe that everyone sees the same content online. Meanwhile, algorithms personalize messages so effectively that a young woman with higher education receives different information than her father. Researchers reveal who truly understands the mechanisms of the digital world.
Poczytaj artykuł wydanie polskie w wydaniu polskim

Algorithmic personalization study. Who and how understands digital mediaillustration: DALL-E

In the age of digital dominance, where every click and swipe leaves a trace, the topic of content personalization takes on a new dimension. Vaclav Moravec from Charles University in Prague and a team of researchers from the Czech Republic, Croatia, Poland, Slovakia, and Ukraine examined how different social groups understand the phenomenon of online content personalization. Based on data collected from 1,213 Czech citizens, the authors show that awareness of how personalization algorithms work in media is highly socially differentiated. The results of the study were published in the article “Algorithmic personalization: a study of knowledge gaps and digital media literacy” in Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, part of the Nature Portfolio.

Content personalization: opportunity or threat?


The main goal of the study was to analyze citizens’ knowledge of how online services tailor content to users. Personalization relies on data - from search history to location and shopping preferences - and serves to increase message relevance. But while the benefits are clear (faster access to relevant information, tailored ads), there is growing concern about the loss of privacy and informational manipulation.


The authors of the “Algorithmic personalization” report emphasize that understanding personalization mechanisms is key not only to protecting personal data but also to the ability to critically assess content. Informed individuals can influence algorithms, limit manipulation, and better protect their privacy.

Who knows more? Social differences in knowledge about algorithms


Researchers used a three-step analysis system based on an informational model, fuzzy logic method, and social classification. They asked respondents about:

  • awareness that online content is personalized,
  • knowledge of technical ways content is customized,
  • feeling of control over what they see online.

Based on these three areas, the researchers developed knowledge metrics that include both objective understanding of how algorithms work and users’ subjective sense of influence over their digital environment. The study`s authors used data from 1,213 surveys, analyzing them with demographic variables such as age, gender, and education level. The results made it possible to define knowledge levels about personalization for different social groups with numerical values between 0 and 1 - the higher the value, the greater the user’s awareness.

Social group Knowledge level about personalization
Men aged 35-44, higher education 0.812 (above average)
Women aged 15-24, higher education 0.821-0.812
People with vocational education 0.661-0.672 (low scores)
source: “Algorithmic personalization: a study of knowledge gaps and digital media literacy”


These differences show that younger users with higher education better understand how content-personalizing algorithms work. Meanwhile, those with lower education levels more often report a lack of control over what they see online. This raises questions about informational equality and the need for education.

Real-life example. Netflix and the illusion of choice


Let’s imagine two Netflix users - a thirty-year-old woman with higher education and a fifty-year-old manual worker. Although both open the same platform, the algorithm shows them completely different recommendations. She sees political documentaries and indie films, while he gets comedies and entertainment shows. Both believe they have a choice, but in reality, they watch what the algorithm deems suitable. If they are unaware of this mechanism, they may wrongly assume it’s the result of their “free will.”

This is exactly the issue raised in the report by Moravec and his co-authors - the invisible hand of the algorithm guides the user, who often doesn’t realize it.

Education as the answer


The research team proposes concrete solutions. Their analytical-information system allows for nuanced evaluation of citizens’ knowledge, accounting for demographic differences. Notably:

  • the system works regardless of the number of criteria or questions,
  • it can be adapted to other regions or countries,
  • it enables the implementation of educational programs tailored to specific social groups.

Got a minute? Find out our #59sec REPORT on Youtube
How clickbait was born? Let's take a look inside headline TRAPS
👇

Thanks to this tool, it is possible, for example, to identify groups most vulnerable to manipulation and include them in specialized media education programs. As the “Algorithmic personalization” report shows, such actions are necessary - especially in the face of the risk that personalization deepens social divides, traps users in information bubbles, and facilitates the spread of disinformation.

Among the researchers’ plans is the development of software that will allow practical application of the methodology in different contexts. The next step is to analyze factors influencing the acceptance of personalized content and to study the relationships between perceived disinformation risks and trust in media.

The study by Moravec and his co-authors is not only a scientific analysis but also a call to action for policymakers - from NGOs to state institutions - not to ignore differences in digital competencies. The more people understand how algorithms work, the lower the risk that society will become a passive recipient of manufactured content.

* * *
More about the study: Moravec V., Hynek N., Skare M., Gavurova B., Polishchuk V. (2025). Algorithmic personalization: a study of knowledge gaps and digital media literacy. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-025-04593-6

Share the article:

dodaj na Facebook prześlij przez Messenger dodaj na Twitter dodaj na LinkedIn

COMMERCIAL BREAK
Work In Media

New articles in section Media industry

Communication gap. Is anyone listening to Polish women?

Krzysztof Fiedorek
Brands claim they understand women. Media say they speak their language. Meanwhile the report "Polki 2025" shows that most messages still miss the mark. Women do not want empty slogans. They expect a dialogue that truly relates to them.

Most medical influencer posts on TikTok are FALSE

KFi
Researchers from East Carolina University Health Medical Center analysed 120 TikTok videos tagged with hashtags such as #naturalparenting, #antivaccine, and #holistichealth. The results of their study leave no doubt.

Dead internet theory is a fact. Bots now outnumber people online

Krzysztof Fiedorek
Already 51% of global internet traffic is generated by bots, not people. As many as two-thirds of accounts on X are likely bots, and on review platforms, three out of ten reviews weren't written by a human. Do you feel something is off online? It's not paranoia. In 2025, it's a reality.


See articles on a similar topic:

Hate speech is contagious and leads to harm [EXPERT OPINION]

Karolina Kropiwiec
‘If we are in an environment where certain groups of people are insulted, there is a high probability that we will start using such language ourselves; hate speech is contagious and its consequence is someone's harm,’ says Dr. Michał Bilewicz from the Centre for Research on Prejudice at the University of Warsaw.

DAB+ Radio. What is Digital Radio Broadcasting?

Krzysztof Fiedorek
Digital radio broadcasting technology, compared to traditional analog radio, provides higher sound quality, better resistance to interference, and more additional features during transmission. However, it’s not without drawbacks and raises concerns among broadcasters.

Press Readership in Poland. The Wealthy Read Ten Times More Often

BARD
Wealthy individuals in Poland read newspapers and magazines up to ten times more frequently than the average Pole, according to a report by Polish Readership Research. They mainly read monthly magazines and dedicate about an hour per day to reading. Only 18% of people in this group do not read any press at all.

Journalism and Technology. How Indian Newspapers Fight to Survive

KFi
The COVID-19 pandemic accelerated the transformation of India's press industry. Traditional print media, forced to fight for survival, adopted modern technologies ranging from data analysis to artificial intelligence. How do journalists adapt to new roles, and how do media redefine their future in the digital age? Researchers from the Symbiosis Institute of Media & Communication have explored these questions.

More in the section: Media industry

Work in media

United States
New York • Washington DC • Los Angeles • Chicago • Houston • Phoenix • Philadelphia United Kingdom
London • Birmingham • Manchester • Liverpool • Glasgow • Edinburgh Canada
Toronto • Ottawa • Montreal • Calgary Australia
Sydney • Melbourne • Brisbane • canberra Ireland, New Zealand, India

advertisement

Media Review 24/7




community

Facebook LinkedIn X Twitter TikTok Instagram Threads Youtube Google News Blue Sky Social RSS

Reporterzy.info - online media studies magazine. The world of communication from the inside. Media, journalism, PR and marketing. Data, reports, analyses, advice. History and market, law, photography, job offers.



Reporter shopping

Reporter shopping

Affordable laptops, notebooks and netbooks
Affordable laptops, notebooks and netbooks
for writing
Digital SLR and compact cameras
Digital SLR and compact cameras
for photographers
Books and e-books about media
Books and e-books about media
for reading
Video drones and flying cameras
Video drones and flying cameras
for pilots
Gimbals for stabilizing video
Gimbals for stabilizing video
for those on the move
Software and apps for creative work
Software and apps for creative work
for digital creators
More occasions

follow us 👉 on Youtube
Watch more 👇
#59sec REPORT SHORTS
Read books and e-books

Read books and e-books

Okładka Understanding Media: The Extensions of Man
Understanding Media: The Extensions of Man
Okładka Media Control. The Spectacular Achievements of Propaganda
Media Control. The Spectacular Achievements of Propaganda
Okładka Social Media Marketing All-in-One For Dummies
Social Media Marketing All-in-One For Dummies
Okładka Mass Communication: Living in a Media World
Mass Communication: Living in a Media World
Okładka Trust Me, I`m Lying: Confessions of a Media Manipulator
Trust Me, I`m Lying: Confessions of a Media Manipulator
Okładka Hate, Inc.: Why Today`s Media Makes Us Despise One Another
Hate, Inc.: Why Today`s Media Makes Us Despise One Another
more books and e-books

Reporterzy.info

More about us

Our tools and services

Contact


© Dwornik.pl Bartłomiej Dwornik 2oo1-2o25