po polsku
illustration: Bing AIShe reports that as many as 25 percent of girls in the 18-24 age group follow virtual influencers. In the 55+ group, on the other hand, most people do not even know that this phenomenon exists.
Most virtual influencers have been created for marketing purposes; their purpose is to earn money. However, we must not forget about their other, more or less hidden goals, e.g. political or social ones. After all, they perform opinion-forming functions, as the name `influencer` suggests.
The first virtual influencer, Lil Miquela, was created in 2016. She - and other such characters - `run` social media profiles, `record` albums that are available on popular platforms, and `take part` in advertisements for real brands or promotions of places. Whole teams of people are behind these activities - from programmers and graphic designers to storytellers.
- Thanks to the development of generative artificial intelligence, we increasingly interact with characters with an unclear ontological status. After all, for many people, virtual characters are alive, despite the lack of a biological body: they exist in some world, they are active, they earn money, they interact, they can answer questions. This creates an emotional bond that is enough to influence a person - the researcher says.
By design, virtual influencers are supposed to be imperfect like people. `They have all the physical attributes that human influencers try to avoid: freckles, smudged makeup, hair sticking out in the morning, sweat on their forehead. In addition, they do not hide that they are digital characters. This means that they are perceived as authentic by Gen Alpha - even more so than those real influencers who often use various types of tools to improve their appearance and strive for the ideal`, she says.
She added that this is where a deeper problem begins. `Authenticity is separated from whether something is real or not. It turns out that it can be attributed to something that does not exist. We still have a division between fiction and reality, because the offline-online division has long since collapsed. Now, the division between the living and non-living is also beginning to blur. That is why future generations will certainly face the problem of distinguishing truth from falsehood, reality from illusion`, she says.
The problem will not disappear, on the contrary - the development of technology and artificial intelligence is inevitable. Moreover, with the arrival of 2025, the next generation- Beta - will be born, even more immersed in the digital world and in a sense addicted to the dose of emotions that is associated with it.
According to Dr. Pawlak, one of the advantages of virtual influencers is that they accept their recipients as they are. `In the right thumb (like) culture in which we live, the possibility of not being judged seems like a dream. The creators of artificial intelligence know this very well. That is why they create virtual influencers`, she says.
She adds that contact with virtual influencers raises questions: how does the development of technology affect intimacy? Will new forms of parasocial relationships (with chatbots, virtual influencers) be the answer to loneliness and the need for closeness?
Dr. Pawlak also mentions a fairly new, developing trend, in which virtual influencers are used to `pull` people out of the online world, e.g. by connecting users who will go out for dinner together, or by promoting real places worth visiting.
`I compare the achievements of artificial intelligence to fast food. If I eat a hamburger every once in a while, I know that nothing will happen to me. But if I make it a habit, then after a short while my psychological and physical well-being will deteriorate. There are already scientific studies that have shown that lonely people who spend too much time with a synthetic companion begin to anthropomorphize this character at some point, and really treat it as a human being`, she says.
She adds that technology itself is neither bad nor good, nor even neutral.
- It all depends on the usage - on how we will use these tools, as well as on our entire emotional and social background, the protective digital suit - she says.
source: PAP - Science in Poland
COMMERCIAL BREAK
New articles in section Media industry
Who trusts articles written by artificial intelligence? Results of a study from China
Krzysztof Fiedorek
Young readers trust machines more than human writers. When they consume news, they prefer the cool objectivity of algorithms over human emotions. They believe that articles created by AI are objective. As they interact with these texts more frequently, they rarely notice any harmful biases in them.
Who really controls the news on the internet? A study from Spain
Krzysztof Fiedorek
Analysis of more than thirteen thousand articles reveals behind-the-scenes mechanisms of spanish digital media. Left-wing portals are responsible for 50.33 percent of texts on lobbying. The energy lobby generates 63.41 percent of publications. Only one daily newspaper evaluates pressure groups positively.
Children and artificial intelligence. The generation of a global experiment is growing
Joanna Sokołowska, UNICEF Polska
A UNICEF analysis based on new data from 10 countries shows that at least 20 million children have already used artificial intelligence (AI). Many of them are ahead of adults, adopting these technologies at a pace more than three times faster.
See articles on a similar topic:
Fake News and Disinformation in Poland. Scale, Impact and Future
Bartłomiej Dwornik
Where do the sources of disinformation lie, and how large is the scale of this wave? Why are we so susceptible to false information, and what role do traditional media play in this puzzle? Let’s shed some light on these issues and face the question: can the battle against the flood of disinformation still be won?
Algorithmic personalization study. Who and how understands digital media
KFi
Most internet users believe that everyone sees the same content online. Meanwhile, algorithms personalize messages so effectively that a young woman with higher education receives different information than her father. Researchers reveal who truly understands the mechanisms.
Disinformation ranks above terrorism as global threat
KFi
According to "International Opinion on Global Threats" by Pew Research Center, a median of 72% of adults across 25 countries view the spread of false information online as a major threat to their country. That number places disinformation at the very top of perceived global dangers.
How the Media Talk (or Stay Silent) About Climate. Reuters Institute Report
Krzysztof Fiedorek
Although climate change is becoming increasingly noticeable worldwide, the media have failed to maintain growing interest in the topic. The report "Climate Change and News Audiences 2024" shows that audience engagement with climate topics has remained almost unchanged for several years.
