
Modern marital relationships have undergone a remarkable transformation in the age of social media. Three researchers, Oqab Jabali, Bilal Hamamra, and Fayez Mahamid from An-Najah National University in Nablus, Palestine, explored the impact of social media on communication in relationships. Their findings were published in the journal Nature, Humanities and Social Sciences Communications.
“Modern relationships and social media: exploring the digital dynamics of husband–wife interactions” highlights how digital platforms have become an integral part of daily life, influencing communication methods and interactions. The study, conducted among 388 Palestinian couples from the West Bank, sheds new light on the issue.
Over 60% of respondents live in rural areas, significantly shaping their perception of social media. Couples from these regions exhibit a more optimistic view of technology’s impact on their relationships. Additionally, 40.2% of participants use social media for 2 to 4 hours daily, placing them in the moderate user category.
Social Media Builds Bridges of Understanding
One of the most significant aspects of the study is the analysis of social media’s impact on communication in relationships. The findings show that:
- 2.72 out of 5 points for improving communication between spouses through social media.
- 3.16 points for the ability to maintain contact during physical separation.
Despite its moderate impact on communication, platforms like Facebook and Instagram often help build bridges between partners, particularly in young relationships. In practice, this means more frequent interactions and easier access to emotional support, addressing the needs of modern couples.
Challenges of Technological Intimacy
However, not everything looks rosy. The report reveals that social media often becomes a source of tension:
- 3.73 points for perceived exposure to temptations and relationship threats.
- 3.34 points for increased jealousy and feelings of insecurity.
Examples include situations where partners monitor each other’s online activities, leading to misunderstandings and tension. In such cases, a lack of open communication can escalate conflict.
Impact of Demographic Factors
An intriguing finding of the study is the difference in social media perceptions based on gender, location, and education level:
- Women are more likely to view social media as a positive element in relationships.
- Couples from rural areas have a more optimistic outlook compared to city residents.
The table below shows variations in social media usage depending on the length of the marriage:
Years of Marriage | 2–4 Hours Daily | 4–6 Hours Daily | More than 7 Hours |
---|---|---|---|
Less than 5 years | 56 | 36 | 12 |
6–10 years | 24 | 32 | 12 |
11–15 years | 28 | 16 | 0 |
More than 15 years | 48 | 28 | 12 |
These data indicate that younger marriages more frequently engage with social media, likely due to greater technological proficiency.
According to social exchange theory (SET), relationships are based on a balance between benefits and costs. In the context of social media, benefits such as greater connectivity and emotional support are weighed against costs like jealousy and privacy disruption. Achieving balance requires conscious management of digital habits and open communication between partners.
* * *
The study “Modern relationships and social media: exploring the digital dynamics of husband–wife interactions” was conducted in April 2023. The authors analyzed data from 388 couples from the West Bank. Respondents represented various demographic groups, including urban and rural residents, couples with varying marital durations, and different education levels. The study methodology relied on a 23-question survey addressing social media use and its impact on aspects of relationships like communication, trust, intimacy, and conflict resolution. The rating scale was based on a five-point Likert scale.
The full study is available at:
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41599-024-04289-3
COMMERCIAL BREAK
New articles in section Media industry
Communication gap. Is anyone listening to Polish women?
Krzysztof Fiedorek
Brands claim they understand women. Media say they speak their language. Meanwhile the report "Polki 2025" shows that most messages still miss the mark. Women do not want empty slogans. They expect a dialogue that truly relates to them.
Most medical influencer posts on TikTok are FALSE
KFi
Researchers from East Carolina University Health Medical Center analysed 120 TikTok videos tagged with hashtags such as #naturalparenting, #antivaccine, and #holistichealth. The results of their study leave no doubt.
Dead internet theory is a fact. Bots now outnumber people online
Krzysztof Fiedorek
Already 51% of global internet traffic is generated by bots, not people. As many as two-thirds of accounts on X are likely bots, and on review platforms, three out of ten reviews weren't written by a human. Do you feel something is off online? It's not paranoia. In 2025, it's a reality.
See articles on a similar topic:
Algorithmic personalization study. Who and how understands digital media
KFi
Most internet users believe that everyone sees the same content online. Meanwhile, algorithms personalize messages so effectively that a young woman with higher education receives different information than her father. Researchers reveal who truly understands the mechanisms.
Influencers and social video rule information. Digital News Report 2025
Krzysztof Fiedorek
Seconds of vertical clips set the future of news. TikTok, YouTube and an army of influencers pull viewers away from TV sets and newspaper pages. Whoever masters this new pulse seizes not only attention but also control of the story.
COVID-Skeptics in Media. Dentsu Agency Study
BARD
A significant presence of COVID-skepticism, which downplays the pandemic or focuses on conspiracy theories, accounts for approximately 8% of online content related to the coronavirus. The primary sources of knowledge about COVID-19 and the current situation are the internet, social media, television, and increasingly, family and friends.
Hate speech is contagious and leads to harm [EXPERT OPINION]
Karolina Kropiwiec
‘If we are in an environment where certain groups of people are insulted, there is a high probability that we will start using such language ourselves; hate speech is contagious and its consequence is someone's harm,’ says Dr. Michał Bilewicz from the Centre for Research on Prejudice at the University of Warsaw.