po polsku
illustration: DALL-EThe phenomenon of fake news, especially strong in the age of social media, presents a tough choice for governments and citizens. Should we protect freedom of speech at all costs, or impose restrictions to shield the public from manipulation? The report Explanatory factors for the dissemination and control of fake news in the Latin American context, published in the journal Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, seeks to answer this question.
The report was authored by four researchers from the University of Santiago de Compostela: Paulo Carlos López-López, María Pereira-López, Erika Jaráiz-Gulías, and Nieves Lagares-Díez. Their analysis is based on data from the 2023 Latinobarómetro survey, covering six countries in the region: Argentina, Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Mexico, and Peru.
The researchers aimed not only to describe public opinion on fighting disinformation but also to identify the factors influencing citizens’ support for regulating online content—even at the expense of freedom of speech. As it turns out, the decision to support fake news control is closely tied to political context, trust in institutions, and personal ideological beliefs.
Majority supports control, even at the cost of freedom
The authors analyzed data from the 2023 Latinobarómetro survey, which included Argentina, Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Mexico, and Peru. The results were clear: in each of these countries, the majority supported controlling fake news—even if it meant limiting freedom of expression.
| Country | Support for Fake News Control | Support for Freedom of Speech |
|---|---|---|
| Colombia | 70.4% | 29.6% |
| Chile | 68.5% | 31.5% |
| Brazil | 66.7% | 33.3% |
| Peru | 63.4% | 36.6% |
| Mexico | 59.5% | 40.5% |
| Argentina | 61.9% | 38.1% |
The highest support for regulation was seen in Colombia, which the researchers link to recent political crises and protests, where fake news spread widely. In contrast, citizens in Mexico and Argentina were more likely to defend freedom of speech, possibly due to a stronger tradition of liberalism or opposition to current leadership.
Social media under scrutiny
Citizens were clear about where they believe fake news spreads the most:
- 75% of Brazilians said fake news most often appears on social media.
- Over half also pointed to television as a source of disinformation.
- Radio and print media were seen as relatively more reliable.
This shows that how people view disinformation depends on their trust in the medium. In Mexico, 12% of respondents said the press contains no fake news—the highest result in the region.
Social profile of those who support information control
According to the report, a typical supporter of fake news control is someone who:
- voted for the ruling party,
- is unhappy with democracy,
- has low political interest,
- prefers authoritarian governance,
- comes from a lower social class.
In Brazil, 40.7% of the variation in responses could be explained by these variables. In Chile, it was 40.8%. In Mexico, 41%.
Education does not shield against support for censorship
It may be surprising that higher education levels don’t always lead to stronger support for freedom of speech. In some countries—like Peru and Chile—people with higher education were more likely to support fake news control. In Brazil, the gap between education levels reached 16 percentage points.
There was also an opposite trend: in Argentina, those with higher education were more likely to defend freedom of expression. This shows that the impact of education is highly contextual and depends on the local political situation.
Political ideology: surprising findings
Contrary to stereotypes, it`s not just the political right that opposes information control. In Argentina and Brazil, it was the far left that more often supported fake news censorship. This is linked to current political tensions—such as Milei’s election or Bolsonaro’s controversial presidency.
In Colombia, those with centrist views were more likely to favor restrictions. Mexico and Peru showed a different pattern: the further to the right, the more support for information control. This means ideological divides are not universal—they depend on local context.
Media use and online behavior data
The analysis also looked at specific platforms and their users:
- Users of Instagram in Brazil and Argentina were more likely to support information control.
- In Mexico, using YouTube, Instagram, and TikTok was linked to greater support for freedom of speech.
- Those who believed social media has a positive impact on politics were less likely to support control.
These findings show that it’s not just the media itself, but also how people perceive its role in democracy that shapes their views on censorship and freedom of information.
The report also describes the case of Brazil, where a court ordered the shutdown of platform X (formerly Twitter) for failing to remove accounts spreading disinformation and hate speech. The decision affected over 40 million users. According to an AtlasIntel poll, Brazilian society was nearly evenly split on the matter—with a slight edge to opponents of the decision.
***
The study was based on Latinobarómetro 2023 data, including 7,204 respondents from Argentina, Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Mexico, and Peru. Logistic regression analysis and descriptive statistics were used, considering 44 variables grouped into four blocks: demographic, political, cultural, and media-related. The goal was to identify which factors influence citizen support for fake news control at the expense of freedom of speech. Full results are available at https://www.nature.com/articles/s41599-025-05100-7
COMMERCIAL BREAK
New articles in section Media industry
Yellow Badge. Jan Bluz's documentary on political prisoners in Belarus
BARD
Imagine writing three posts on a social networking site. For a few clicks on a keyboard, you get three years in a penal colony. Sounds like a grim joke? For political prisoners in Belarus, this is the reality that Jan Bluz shows in the documentary "Yellow Badge", produced with the support of the Pulitzer Center.
Advertising market 2025. Poland, Europe and the World
Marcin Grządka
The global advertising market is growing by 8.8% in 2025 and will reach a value of 1.14 trillion dollars. The industry result in Europe records slightly lower dynamics, at the level of 5.8%. In this comparison, Poland performs clearly above the average. We will record an increase of 8.9% this year and a value of 18.56 billion PLN - estimates WPP Media in the annual report "This Year Next Year".
The print media market 2025. Three global trends
Krzysztof Fiedorek
The market value is 359.53 billion dollars, yet the erosion is visible to the naked eye. The decline for newspapers will amount to -2.3 percent. Despite this, print retains strength: it generates 76 percent of subscription revenues and enjoys 82 percent consumer trust. The future of the industry is defined by hybrid strategies and niche specialization.
See articles on a similar topic:
Algorithmic personalization study. Who and how understands digital media
KFi
Most internet users believe that everyone sees the same content online. Meanwhile, algorithms personalize messages so effectively that a young woman with higher education receives different information than her father. Researchers reveal who truly understands the mechanisms.
Radio Fanatics. Who Listens for One-Third of the Day?
Bartłomiej Dwornik
One in five listeners now spends over 8 hours daily listening to the radio, according to data from the Radio Track study. Since the beginning of the year, the number of these avid listeners has grown by 300,000.
Violence in Media and Child Rearing
Małgorzata Więczkowska
The influence of mass media on individuals is now an undisputed fact. There is no place today where this impact on religious, moral, political, social, or educational attitudes cannot be felt.
Pseudo-democracy and Media - A Few Reflections
Grzegorz D. Stunża
Every four years, citizens are served elections, which are certainly not free. Polls replace part of the electoral process, shaping opinions and voting preferences.
