po polsku
illustration: DALL-EThe rise of generative artificial intelligence (AI) presents traditional media and journalism with a new challenge. According to the Generative AI and News Report 2025 published by the Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism, more than half of respondents from six countries believe that media frequently use AI. However, the report’s authors - Felix Simon, Rasmus Kleis Nielsen, and Richard Fletcher - emphasize that only a small portion of the audience accepts full automation of news content.
In a study conducted by YouGov between June and July 2025 in Argentina, Denmark, France, Japan, the United Kingdom, and the USA, the report’s authors analyzed how AI is perceived in the context of media. The results show a society at a crossroads - using AI tools but not ready to give up full control of information to them.
Only 12% want news created entirely by AI
The study shows a clear "comfort gap" between acceptance of news written by humans and those generated by machines. Only 12% of respondents feel comfortable with content created fully by AI. When a person controls the process, acceptance rises to 21%, and when a journalist leads with AI support - up to 43%. The largest share (62%) prefers news created entirely by humans.
Interestingly, the less visible the role of AI, the greater the acceptance. Users most often tolerate AI use for "editorial back-office" tasks:
- 55% accept AI use for improving grammar and spelling,
- 53% - for translations,
- only 30% - for rewriting content for different audiences,
- just 19% - for creating artificial presenters or authors.
There are no major demographic differences in these values, suggesting a general caution toward AI as a news "narrator".
7 facts about news on social media 👇
People notice AI in newsrooms, but rarely in the content
In 2025, belief grew that journalists use generative AI. Respondents most often pointed to text editing, translation help, and headline creation as areas where AI is active. Still, 60% of audiences say they do not notice AI in their daily news consumption, possibly due to lack of labeling or subtle integration.
Only 19% of respondents see labels about AI use on a daily basis. When compared with the fact that 77% claim to use news daily, this shows a clear gap between actual exposure and perception. This raises questions about transparency in newsrooms.
| Type of AI Use in Newsrooms | Public Acceptance |
|---|---|
| Grammar and spelling editing | 55% |
| Translations | 53% |
| Rewriting for audiences | 30% |
| Artificial presenter or author | 19% |
Despite the growing use of AI in newsrooms, public trust in the process is still low. Only 33% of respondents believe journalists routinely check AI-generated content before publishing. This rate rises in Argentina (44%) and Japan (42%), but drops to just 25% in the United Kingdom.
Younger people use AI to understand the news
A new trend noted in the Generative AI and News Report 2025 is the growing use of AI as a tool to understand and interpret the news, especially among younger audiences. Although only 6% of all respondents use AI weekly for news purposes, as many as 48% of those aged 18-24 use generative tools to simplify news content. In comparison - only 27% of people aged 55+ seek such help.
Other ways AI is used in working with news:
- 54% ask about the latest news,
- 47% ask follow-up questions,
- 40% request content summaries,
- 37% evaluate information sources.
However, overall use of such functions remains niche, and society still sees AI more as a supporting tool than a source of knowledge.
Trust in AI is lower than in journalists
The authors of the report point out a clear difference in trust levels between traditional journalism and generative AI. In all six countries surveyed - except Argentina - trust in ChatGPT as a news source was lower than trust in traditional media.
| AI Model | Trust Level |
|---|---|
| ChatGPT | 29% |
| Google Gemini | 18% |
| Microsoft Copilot | 12% |
| Meta AI | 12% |
In this context, it is worth highlighting the UK, where only 25% of respondents believe journalists verify AI-generated content, and it is also the only country where more people say they distrust ChatGPT than trust it.
- People trust newsrooms more than bots.
- They expect more accountability from well-known brands.
- They still value human control over the publishing process.
- They are skeptical of automatic summaries and AI presenters.
- They notice the lack of clear labeling of AI-generated content.
Even though technology is advancing rapidly, traditional journalism has not been dethroned. It is trust and transparency that remain newsrooms’ greatest assets in the age of artificial intelligence.
***
The "Generative AI and News Report 2025" was based on a study conducted by YouGov for the Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism and the University of Copenhagen. The online survey was carried out between June and July 2025 in six countries: Argentina, Denmark, France, Japan, the United Kingdom, and the USA. The sample included about 2,000 people in each country and was selected to reflect the demographic structure of the population. The full text is available on the Reuters Institute website.
COMMERCIAL BREAK
New articles in section Media industry
Freelancers 2025 in media and advertising. Useme report
Krzysztof Fiedorek
The modern media and communication market presents entirely new challenges for independent creators. Traditional services are giving way to more complex forms of messaging. The most popular industries in which Polish freelancers operate focus on companies' online presence and visual content.
Video content in Poland. What and how we watch
Paweł Sobczak
Video content is watched remotely, but streaming services are mainly enjoyed in the comfort of home. This is how the consumption of audiovisual content by Poles in 2025 can be summarized. This is the result of an analysis of a study conducted by SW Research and data from the company MEGOGO.
How artificial intelligence misrepresents the news. PBC analysis
Sylwia Markowska
In news summaries generated by the most popular models in Polish, as many as 46% of responses contained at least one significant error, 27% had serious issues with sources (missing, misleading, or incorrect), and 19% contained hallucinations and outdated information.
See articles on a similar topic:
Poles on the Internet. RegionyNEXERY 2024 Report
KFi
The Internet not only connects people but also changes their daily habits in ways that seemed unattainable just a few years ago. Over 40% of Poles work remotely, and IoT devices are gaining popularity in rural areas. The #RegionyNEXERY 2024 report reveals surprising facts about the digital reality.
Women in media 2025. Editorial power knows no equality
KFi
Only 27% of editors-in-chief in the media are women, even though they make up 40% of journalists. In 9 out of 12 countries studied by the Reuters Institute, women in media are less likely to get promoted. It seems that equality in newsrooms is lagging behind broader society. And the gaps go much further.
New Individual Mass Media (Mass Self Communication)
Grzegorz D. Stunża
In the latest issue of "Le Monde Diplomatique," there’s an article by Manuel Castells titled "Individual Mass Media." The author points out that media, once subjective and often party-affiliated (as with newspapers), only briefly moved away from one-sidedness when under various pressures.
Journalism in the age of AI. Why people prefer humans over machines
Krzysztof Fiedorek
Only 12% of people accept news created solely by AI, while 62% prefer those written by humans. At the same time, only 19% notice labels indicating the use of artificial intelligence, while younger audiences ask AI to explain the content to them. These are the findings of the Reuters Institute report on artificial intelligence in media.
