illustration: GeminiSocial robots, which assist humans in daily functioning, are increasingly being used in education. It is already known that robots and virtual assistants can have a positive impact on children`s educational outcomes and support their social development. It also turns out that they can increase the engagement of the youngest in learning.
Therefore, it is important to understand how children navigate contacts with them and in what situations child-robot interactions are most beneficial. This was the focus of researchers from SWPS University: Dr. Konrad Maj, Ariadna Gołębicka, and Zuzanna Siwińska in the study described in the article "How children learn from robots: Educational implications of communicative style and gender in child-robot interaction" published in "Computers & Education".
- Robots in education can be programmed in various ways. They can adapt teaching methods to the individual needs of students, as well as increase motivation and engagement through play or provide immediate feedback - lists Dr. Konrad Maj, a social psychologist, head of the HumanTech Center for Social and Technological Innovation, and lead author of the research. - However, one should not forget that interactions with robots also raise certain doubts, such as whether long-term contact with them will not negatively affect children`s social behavior.
How do children react to humanoid robots?
The study used the 120-centimeter humanoid robot Pepper (created by SoftBank Robotics), which resembles a child. Designed for social contact, the device is equipped with sensors, cameras, and microphones. All this allows Pepper to recognize speech, gestures, and certain emotions. The participants of the study were 251 children aged 7-12.
The researchers considered two aspects: the robot`s communicative style towards a human (polite or commanding) and its "gender" (female or male), which they determined by giving the device a name (Adam or Ada). They chose these factors because they are linked to how children interpret the robot`s intentions, warmth, and authority, which directly affects engagement and academic results. This may be significant for the future design of social robots.
The scientists wondered, among other things, whether children addressed politely by the robot would also be polite to it, whether younger children would be more likely to anthropomorphize the robot (attribute human traits to it) than older ones, and whether girls would have greater tendencies to do so.
Ads know you before you see them. Say hello to predictive AI analytics 👇
During the study, children could get to know the robot, which imitated animals for them, and they observed its reaction to an attempt to take its photo (a polite or categorical message not to do so), to which they were to respond. Afterward, they answered questions about Pepper. They were asked, for example, whether they thought this robot could be happy, whether it dreams, or whether it imagines things.
How will children imitate a robot that asks or commands?
It turned out that children dealing with a polite robot almost always responded to its reaction politely. Those to whom the robot spoke in a commanding way also responded in a polite manner in most cases, rather than replicating its authoritative communication style, which indicates that in this case, established social norms prevail over imitation.
Younger children and girls were significantly more likely to anthropomorphize the robot. It also turned out that human traits were attributed to polite robots more often than to commanding ones, especially when their tone matched gender expectations. Thus, the situation most conducive to this was when the robot was programmed as polite and female.
- Our results lead to the conclusion that social cues in interactions between children and robots in education are exceptionally important - believes Dr. Maj. - Adapting the robot`s communication style to children`s developmental level and their social expectations can increase student engagement and potentially support positive learning outcomes.
As he adds, robots are increasingly appearing in classrooms, so understanding how children perceive and react to them will determine whether they serve as effective learning partners in the future.
COMMERCIAL BREAK
New articles in section Media industry
Vulnerable to disinformation. Study of fake news in social media
KFi, azk/ bst/ amac/
As many as 58 percent of Generation Z individuals are unable to recognize fake news in social media. Among those over 65, this figure stands at 29 percent - according to a study published in Poland by NASK and the Praktycy.eu association.
Radio in Poland 2025. Analysis of listenership and listener behavior
Krzysztof Fiedorek
Radio attracts 17.3 million listeners in Poland every day, who spend over four hours with their receivers. Interestingly, as much as 86 percent of station time is listened to via traditional FM waves. Despite digitalization, the internet accounts for only 12.5 percent of the listenership share.
Tags, hashtags and links in video descriptions. Youtube SEO after Gemini AI update [ANALYSIS]
BARD
Once, positioning a video on Youtube was simple. It was enough to stuff the description with keywords and wait for results. Those days are not coming back. In 2026, the algorithm is no longer a simple search engine that connects dots. It is the powerful Gemini AI artificial intelligence that understands your video better than you do.
See articles on a similar topic:
Dead internet theory is a fact. Bots now outnumber people online
Krzysztof Fiedorek
Already 51% of global internet traffic is generated by bots, not people. As many as two-thirds of accounts on X are likely bots, and on review platforms, three out of ten reviews weren't written by a human. Do you feel something is off online? It's not paranoia. In 2025, it's a reality.
The Deadliest Year for Journalism. 124 Fatalities in 2024
Krzysztof Fiedorek
The year 2024 was the deadliest for media professionals since the Committee to Protect Journalists began tracking these statistics. The tragic figures, published in CPJs latest special report, reached record highs in most monitored categories.
Television 2025. Report by the European Broadcasting Union
Krzysztof Fiedorek
Europeans are watching less and less television. In 2024, the average viewing time was 3 hours and 13 minutes per day. Only 54% of young people had any contact with TV, and public broadcasters held a 23% share. Television is losing relevance, especially among the youngest viewers.
DAB+ Radio. What is Digital Radio Broadcasting?
Krzysztof Fiedorek
Digital radio broadcasting technology, compared to traditional analog radio, provides higher sound quality, better resistance to interference, and more additional features during transmission. However, it’s not without drawbacks and raises concerns among broadcasters.




























