po polsku
illustration: DALL-EA fake image of comet 3I/ATLAS once again proved how easily the internet can turn a simple astronomical observation into a sci-fi story. This viral shows the mechanism in pure form: the more prestigious the supposed source appears, the faster belief in the attractive fiction spreads.
Emotions over evidence. How a viral begins
Researchers from Warsaw University of Technology emphasize in the "Analysis of polarization and inoculation mechanisms (PW/UJ/SWPS)" that algorithms favor bold and flashy content. Images from Hubble and ESA show an ordinary comet: a blurry coma and a tail reflecting light. But they lack that visual "hook" that gives meme potential. A viral acts like a lens — it magnifies what is easy to remember, even if false.
To show the difference between an attractive fake and a real observation, it’s worth comparing two images from the "Analysis...":
| Image type | Visual features | Reception effect |
|---|---|---|
| Authentic telescope photos | Blurry coma, dust tail, no sharp edges | Lower "clickability" |
| Viral images | Sharpened contours, added "metallic" elements | Increased engagement and false interpretations |
So, we see that manipulation doesn`t have to be sophisticated. Just a few visual tricks are enough for viewers to feel they’re seeing "something extraordinary."
Bubbles, bridges, and leaps. How opinions spread
The model described by researchers from PW in the "Analysis of polarization and inoculation mechanisms" works like a map of social dynamics. It shows two camps connected by bridges — channels of real influence. When bridges are weak, groups stay in their own worlds. When they become too strong, a leap occurs: the entire network adopts a sharp, unified message, regardless of its truth.
This pattern is well illustrated by examples from public health disputes. If one side dominates communication, the other responds with pushback. This leads to waves of trends and countertrends.
What fuels polarization:
- aggressive campaigns targeting only one group,
- poor-quality bridges (lack of trusted intermediaries),
- emotional asymmetry — one side admires, the other rejects,
- lack of preventive education about manipulation.
Researchers show that it’s not the presence of different opinions that raises tensions, but how groups are connected.
Inoculation. How psychological "vaccines" work
Part of the report by UJ describes the inoculation mechanism: a brief training that warns recipients about typical manipulation tricks. The analysis includes exercises that reduce the effect of first impressions and help distinguish falsehood from interpretation.
A real example of such a "vaccine" is the campaign for seniors "Grandma, Grandpa… don’t be fooled." It warns about tricks before a scam appears. This simple technique aligns with the report’s findings: reactions are stronger when the recipient knows the pattern.
SWPS shows another method: an educational game where users play the role of the manipulator. After this experience, people become better at spotting fakes. Results from the study suggest, however, that repeated exposure is needed for a lasting effect. Meanwhile, the SWPS and SGGW team studies awareness of propaganda sources. This method only works in certain conditions. Results don’t automatically repeat, showing how complex social influence processes really are.
COMMERCIAL BREAK
New articles in section Media industry
Who trusts articles written by artificial intelligence? Results of a study from China
Krzysztof Fiedorek
Young readers trust machines more than human writers. When they consume news, they prefer the cool objectivity of algorithms over human emotions. They believe that articles created by AI are objective. As they interact with these texts more frequently, they rarely notice any harmful biases in them.
Who really controls the news on the internet? A study from Spain
Krzysztof Fiedorek
Analysis of more than thirteen thousand articles reveals behind-the-scenes mechanisms of spanish digital media. Left-wing portals are responsible for 50.33 percent of texts on lobbying. The energy lobby generates 63.41 percent of publications. Only one daily newspaper evaluates pressure groups positively.
Children and artificial intelligence. The generation of a global experiment is growing
Joanna Sokołowska, UNICEF Polska
A UNICEF analysis based on new data from 10 countries shows that at least 20 million children have already used artificial intelligence (AI). Many of them are ahead of adults, adopting these technologies at a pace more than three times faster.
See articles on a similar topic:
Hate speech is contagious and leads to harm [EXPERT OPINION]
Karolina Kropiwiec
‘If we are in an environment where certain groups of people are insulted, there is a high probability that we will start using such language ourselves; hate speech is contagious and its consequence is someone's harm,’ says Dr. Michał Bilewicz from the Centre for Research on Prejudice at the University of Warsaw.
The print media market 2025. Three global trends
Krzysztof Fiedorek
The market value is 359.53 billion dollars, yet the erosion is visible to the naked eye. The decline for newspapers will amount to -2.3 percent. Despite this, print retains strength: it generates 76 percent of subscription revenues and enjoys 82 percent consumer trust. The future of the industry is defined by hybrid strategies and niche specialization.
Radio Fanatics. Who Listens for One-Third of the Day?
Bartłomiej Dwornik
One in five listeners now spends over 8 hours daily listening to the radio, according to data from the Radio Track study. Since the beginning of the year, the number of these avid listeners has grown by 300,000.
Media in the Balkans and Turkey
Michał Kuźmiński
The Balkans have long been referred to as a “melting pot,” and for good reason. This region is highly diverse and quite unstable. Consequently, the media landscape here is varied as well. In some places, such as democratic Greece, a member of the European Union, the media market is stable and easy to navigate.
