illustration: DALL-EIn the assessment of Dr. Michał Marek from NASK, factors such as social polarization make Poles particularly susceptible to disinformation. In the study "Are Poles not being fooled by disinformation?" conducted for the Association of Digital Transformation Practitioners, it was reported that:
- 42% of respondents are unsure if they encounter false information in social media,
- 36% are unable to assess whether they have ever been fooled by disinformation on the internet,
- 45% of those surveyed declare they often encounter fake news on platforms such as Facebook, Instagram, TikTok, or YouTube,
- 25% admit that they also often fall for it.
As reported, every seventh Pole does not encounter intentionally misleading content or sees it very rarely, while for every fifth internet user, disinformation has become a daily occurrence.
The Head of the External Threat Analysis Team at NASK, Dr. Michał Marek, when asked by PAP about the tendency of Poles to succumb to disinformation, admitted that no society is completely immune to false information. - We are not as resistant to disinformation as we sometimes evaluate ourselves, or as we would like to see ourselves - he said.
He noted that Poles are strongly polarized both politically and ideologically. Consequently, we react strongly to world events, especially those of international scope, such as the assessment of US policy, further support for Kyiv, and issues related to domestic politics - he added.
The expert explained that disinformation is difficult to detect by so-called average recipients because it is well-camouflaged and tailored to the potential recipient`s worldview. Examples include groups and forums on social networks that infect recipients with conspiracy-themed content, threatening Armageddon, World War III, or being pushed into a war with Russia, which are placed alternately with neutral content, such as DIY advice. - A person does not even know when they are being steered by false news. It may even reach a point where, through subliminal actions, they will be steered in such a way that they begin to perceive their own state as a hostile entity threatening them - he added.
The study shows that the most uncertain age group in identifying fake news is Generation Z.
- 58% of people between 18 and 24 "have no opinion" on this matter because they are not convinced whether what they see is "fake" or true information;
- furthermore, 44% are not sure if they have ever fallen for this type of content;
- on the other hand, 10% of them are aware of content masquerading as truth in social media, seeing it "very often";
- 10% admit that they very often fall for it;
- 5% of respondents believe they have "not at all or almost never" encountered disinformation on their "socials".
Regarding those most susceptible to misleading content on the internet, Michał Marek pointed to two high-risk groups. - The first are the elderly, and the second are the youngest. At the same time, he noted that the content affecting them and the tools used for influence are different - he explained. He added that in the case of youth, it is primarily TikTok, while among people over 50 - Facebook, for example.
Ads know you before you see them. Say hello to predictive AI analytics 👇
However, most respondents believe they recognize disinformation and do not fall for fake news; furthermore, about 39% claim they have never or almost never fallen victim to disinformation - the study stated. This group may include people over 65, i.e., seniors who declare they see more disinformation but are nevertheless certain that "they are not being fooled."
- 25% of this age group admitted that they "very often" see fake news in social media,
- 20% "not at all or almost never see it",
- 29% have no opinion on the matter.
- 3% are misled,
- 39% say it has never happened to them.
As it turns out, the level of education is not a barrier that can protect us from disinformation. According to the study results, "people with higher education notice fake news more often, but at the same time succumb to it almost as often, at 25%, as people with basic education."
- Of course, education matters, but I would not treat it as a factor that 100% determines this. Nevertheless, I have encountered research results indicating that education is important because, for instance, it relates to language proficiency, which increases the ability to verify information - said Michał Marek.
Emotional state also plays a significant role in the level of resistance to fake news. According to the NASK expert, people dissatisfied with their lives, disappointed, or struggling with financial problems are more susceptible to disinformation activities. On the other hand, people in a better emotional state are more often able to control their emotions and - even during a crisis - attempt to verify information.
- Only 9% of respondents admit they could "definitely" distinguish a real photo from an image created by artificial intelligence,
- 43% declare they would have a problem with it.
The group that takes the lead this time regarding difficulty in detecting disinformation is the elderly aged 65 plus. For 57% of them, it is "hard to say" whether they are able to distinguish real graphics from those modified or generated by AI.
According to the expert, it is particularly worth sensitizing this group - especially in the face of the increasing appearance of AI-generated materials - not to uncritically trust everything that appears online, especially on social media, and to place greater trust in official announcements and traditional media.
- To protect yourself from disinformation, it is worth staying calm in the face of alarming or controversial posts and materials encountered on the internet. When we encounter alarming information online, let`s not forward it, like it, call people, or tell our friends if we are not certain that a given crisis situation actually took place. Let`s wait for official announcements confirming or denying the information. Common sense and emotional control are fundamental - concluded Michał Marek from NASK.
The study "Are Poles not being fooled by disinformation?" was conducted on an internet panel (omnibus) on a representative sample of 850 adult Poles in mid-December 2025. The Association of Digital Transformation Practitioners Praktycy.eu was founded in 2024 by former managers of major Polish media outlets to support journalists and media in the transformation process.
source: PAP Nauka w Polsce
COMMERCIAL BREAK
New articles in section Media industry
TVs in Europe, the USA and China. What and how we watch on them
Paweł Sobczak
The Living Room Study shows significant differences in video content consumption across different regions of the world. This is the result of diverse media ecosystems shaped by decades of local broadcasting, channel availability, and strong cultural factors.
Cinema in the era of algorithms and AI
Arkadiusz Murenia
Will artificial intelligence kill the creativity of filmmakers? The most honest answer is: no, AI is unlikely to kill the creativity of filmmakers, but it will very clearly change the place where this creativity manifests itself and, above all, how.
Social media, journalism and advertising. Trust in sponsored content study
Krzysztof Fiedorek
Is sponsored content destroying credibility on social media? Research results are ruthless. We trust regular editorial posts in 87.5 percent of cases. When a bank pays for material, the rate drops to 20 percent. Young recipients equate commerce with falsehood.
See articles on a similar topic:
COVID-Skeptics in Media. Dentsu Agency Study
BARD
A significant presence of COVID-skepticism, which downplays the pandemic or focuses on conspiracy theories, accounts for approximately 8% of online content related to the coronavirus. The primary sources of knowledge about COVID-19 and the current situation are the internet, social media, television, and increasingly, family and friends.
Disinformation ranks above terrorism as global threat
KFi
According to "International Opinion on Global Threats" by Pew Research Center, a median of 72% of adults across 25 countries view the spread of false information online as a major threat to their country. That number places disinformation at the very top of perceived global dangers.
Vulnerable to disinformation. Study of fake news in social media
KFi, azk/ bst/ amac/
As many as 58 percent of Generation Z individuals are unable to recognize fake news in social media. Among those over 65, this figure stands at 29 percent - according to a study published in Poland by NASK and the Praktycy.eu association.
User Generated Content. A minefield for journalists and media
Krzysztof Fiedorek
Over 40% of internet users judge information credibility by likes and views. Only 20% use traditional news channels as a main and first source. A Reuters Institute report highlights the scale and risks of User Generated Content and offers advice on how media can avoid falling into its trap.




























