po polsku
According to Harvard Business Review Polska, which published the study, two test groups were shown three types of programs:
- episodes of the comedy series *Taxi*,
- documentary nature films,
- and Bollywood productions.
One group watched the programs without ads, while the other saw them with ad interruptions. The results were surprising: the group that saw the shows with ads was more satisfied with the programs, regardless of the quality of the ads shown.
source: Harvard Business Review Polska, Why Do We Prefer TV with Ads?Surprisingly, viewers who watched the version with ads were also willing to pay more for DVD sets of productions by the same directors. The study published by Harvard Business Review Polska found that this difference could be as much as 30%.
- viewers of the ad-free version offered $4.18 for a DVD
- viewers of the ad-supported version were willing to pay up to $5.42 for the same DVD.
The study authors note that this principle is reflected in pay TV, even though it doesn’t include ads. These networks structure their programming with built-in breaks.
- What increases viewer enjoyment isn’t the ads themselves but the breaks in the show, - explains Prof. Leif Nelson in an interview with HBRP. - In series, the plot usually consists of six or more parallel storylines that producers continuously juggle. More complex and unpredictable shows, with twists that naturally introduce breaks, were rated higher than programs with a more linear narrative structure.
This is known as the adaptation effect. The researchers found that this effect is much stronger among younger people. As people age, they need less stimulation to feel pleasure and adapt more slowly.
Nelson, Meyvis, and Galak`s research was also published in the Harvard Business Review Polska special report Why Do We Prefer TV with Ads?
COMMERCIAL BREAK
New articles in section Marketing and PR
Data analysis. Warning signs and technical debt
Aleksander Pawzun, CalmFox.pl
Until a few years ago, a classic data warehouse, overnight processing, and reports available in the morning were a sign of organizational maturity. Today, in many companies, these same solutions have become an invisible constraint.
Artificial intelligence in shopping. E-commerce 2026 report
Piotr Michalak, Altavia Kamikaze + K2
Already nearly 40% of Polish consumers use artificial intelligence on their shopping journey, although they often do so unconsciously. According to a report by the Altavia Kamikaze + K2 agency, the current year marks the final transition from traditional searching to recommendations based on AI.
AI marketing versus AI-powered marketing
Karolina Łukasiewicz
How to distinguish a buzzword from artificial intelligence that actually increases business efficiency? Is every marketing strategy using algorithms truly driven by AI? No, because in many cases, AI marketing is merely the automation of specific, previously known processes.
See articles on a similar topic:
Internet Subscriptions: Market Value, Development Trends, and... Risks
KrzysztoF
According to McKinsey & Company, the number of subscription users globally has increased by over 17% in the past year. A report from UBS Group AG indicates that the total value of the global subscription market will reach as much as $1.5 trillion by 2025. This is twice as much as in 2020!
The future of search is now. How AI is reshaping brand visibility
KFi
AI Search and Share of Voice are no longer optional marketing metrics. They’re essential. Yet only 7% of Polish companies use AI. In the new search landscape, that’s nowhere near enough. Fall behind now, and your brand could simply... vanish from the internet.
LabOOOratorium. Education, Business and Win-Win-Win Cooperation
fundacja OOO
How to combine diversifying activities in kindergartens and schools with setting innovative trends in education and social engagement of businesses? The educational foundation Ogólnopolski Operator Oświaty and the company Musicon show how to do it right.
Brand visibility in the age of algorithms
Aleksander Pawzun
A few years ago, everything was simpler. It was enough to have a good website, do SEO, run a blog, and publish on social media. Whoever was systematic was visible. Whoever invested in content and positioning gained customers. That world no longer exists.
