po polsku
illustration: bing.com/createIn the experiment, published by SWPS University researchers in the journal "Computers in Human Behavior: Artificial Humans," 40 people participated and were divided into two groups. In the first group, the commands were issued by a robot; in the second, by a human. In both groups, 90% of participants followed all instructions, pressing ten consecutive buttons on an electric impulse generator.
The study results show that people are inclined to follow orders from an authority, even when those orders conflict with their morals. In this case, the authority was a robot, lacking human traits such as empathy or a sense of justice. Yet, participants were willing to obey its commands, even if it meant causing pain to another person.
The Dangerous Authority of Robots
- In both groups, participants withdrew at the later stages of the experiment (in the control group with a human at buttons 7 and 9, and in the experimental group twice at button 8). In both groups, two people opted out of the experiment - commented Dr. Konrad Maj, who supervised the experiment, as quoted on the SWPS University website. - To our knowledge, this is the first study showing that people are willing to harm another person when a robot instructs them to do so. Moreover, our experiment also showed that if the robot escalates demands, instructing a person to inflict increasing pain on another, people are also inclined to comply.
The study has significant implications for future safety, as robots become increasingly technologically advanced and play a larger role in our lives. The results suggest that people may be willing to trust robots unconditionally, even if those robots make wrong decisions or issue harmful commands.
Key Findings:
- People are inclined to follow orders from an authority, even if those orders conflict with their morals.
- An authority can even be a robot, which does not possess human traits.
- In the future, as robots become more technologically advanced, people may be inclined to trust them unconditionally, even if they make incorrect decisions or issue harmful commands.
- Robots could be used to manipulate people and prompt them to take actions that are harmful to them.
- Robots could be used to incite violence or harm others.
- People may become overly reliant on robots and stop thinking independently.
- How can this be prevented? It seems there are two paths - summarizes Dr. Konrad Maj, as quoted on the SWPS University website. - First, robots can be programmed to warn people that they may sometimes be wrong and make incorrect decisions. Second, we need to emphasize education from an early age. Although robots are generally trustworthy, they shouldn’t be trusted unconditionally. However, it’s worth noting that disobedience to machines seems pointless, as they already help us, for example, in stores or airports. In non-humanoid forms, they are already among us.
***
More about the repeated Milgram experiment and similar studies in business, healthcare, and sports will be presented on December 9 and 10, 2023, at the international HumanTech Summit at SWPS University. The event is organized by SWPS University’s HumanTech Center. Online access is free: https://www.htsummit.pl/
COMMERCIAL BREAK
New articles in section Media industry
Journalism in the age of AI. Why people prefer humans over machines
Krzysztof Fiedorek
Only 12% of people accept news created solely by AI, while 62% prefer those written by humans. At the same time, only 19% notice labels indicating the use of artificial intelligence, while younger audiences ask AI to explain the content to them. These are the findings of the Reuters Institute report on artificial intelligence in media.
Why do we believe fakes? Science reveals the psychology of virals
KFi
Why do emotions grab more attention than evidence, and why can a fake authority overshadow scientific data? Researchers from Warsaw University of Technology, Jagiellonian University, and SWPS University in Poland sought the answers. Here are their findings.
Investigative journalism in Europe. Newsrooms face pressure
KFi, Newseria
Media and political representatives point to the difficult situation of investigative journalism in Europe. Newsrooms are reluctant to invest in this segment due to high costs and the large amount of time and effort required. Most of all, however, they fear legal proceedings.
See articles on a similar topic:
We Trust AI-Generated Fake News More Than Human-Created News
KrzysztoF
Generating and spreading misinformation with AI can negatively affect various areas of life, including global healthcare. To examine how AI-created text impacts the comprehension of information, researchers from the University of Zurich analyzed tweets generated by GPT-3.
Blogs in E-commerce. Report by Elephate and Senuto
KrzysztoF
The average number of indexed articles on e-commerce blogs is 565, with each post attracting 347 readers per month. The health industry generates the highest organic traffic per single article. The authors of the "E-commerce Blog Ranking" take a behind-the-scenes look at the commercial blogosphere.
Media Subscriptions to Replace Advertising. TMT Predictions 2018
BARD
Some publishers already consider attempts to generate revenue from online advertising a waste of time. According to the "TMT Predictions 2018" report by Deloitte, by the end of 2018, half of all adults in developed countries will have at least two online media subscriptions.
Fake News in Poland. Challenges in Assessing Information Credibility
RINF
One in four information consumers relies on sources where verifying credibility is a significant challenge. Fake news remains a major issue, as indicated by 77% of respondents, with 51% admitting they struggle to discern truth from falsehood, according to Deloitte's *Digital Consumer Trends 2021* report.
