
For the human species, creating lasting relationships, knowing who is worth cooperating with and who to avoid, is valuable. Evolution has equipped us with skills that enable us to assess the moral actions of others. One element of such an assessment may be determining how likely it is that someone will deceive us. This approach implies that people who declare themselves moral and then act differently - may pose a threat.
Studies conducted on adults have shown that people who exhibit moral hypocrisy, that is, people who not only act immorally, but also in a way that contradicts what they declare, are judged as worse than people who are immoral but honest about it. Many studies indicate that such hypocrites are judged worse than people whose behaviour does not contradict their declared opinions, being perceived as deceitful and untrustworthy.
Scientists have long observed that children are particularly sensitive to immoral behaviour in others and prefer pro-social attitudes. However, few studies determine whether children are able to recognize moral hypocrisy and how it affects their judgment, which is why scientists from SWPS University decided to look into this issue. They conducted three experiments as part of the study, and published their results in the journal Developmental Science.
The scientists worked with children aged 4-6. In one experiment, preschoolers watched a video featuring animal-shaped puppets, one of which was building a tower of blocks and the other would then destroy it. One of the puppets represented an attitude of moral hypocrisy, and thus seemingly followed moral norms, but its behaviour contradicted this.
By switching roles in the scenes, the scientists were able to confirm the hypotheses: children assessed hypocrites more negatively than characters who simply behaved inappropriately by destroying buildings, and what`s more - the assessment of the entire event involving the former was more negative.
The experiment confirmed that children distinguish hypocrites from other people and, like adults, assess them more negatively. The second experiment showed, in turn, that hypocrites are perceived as worse due to the contradictory signals they send to their surroundings.
The work of scientists from USWPS contributes new knowledge to research on human morality, including the theory of moral hypocrisy.
– It is also crucial to understand the significance of negative assessment of such people in the context of undertaking cooperation. Moral hypocrisy threatens group work by undermining trust. In addition, hypocrites who send misleading signals disrupt the integrity of the group, which is essential for cooperation – explained Katarzyna Myślińska-Szarek, PhD, from the Faculty of Psychology in Sopot at SWPS University, who conducted the research together with Wiesław Baryła, PhD, a professor at SWPS University.
The researchers point out that it is worth looking at the results of the experiments more broadly, e.g. in terms of building social trust. Early detection of hypocrisy may be an important cognitive function, enabling children to better distinguish between trustworthy and untrustworthy people in their environment. Similar sensitivity may result from the need to accurately recognize allies.
The scientists conclude that authenticity and consistency in moral education of the youngest children are also very important, and caregivers should be mindful of their actions being consistent with their declarations, because - as it turns out - children are discerning observers of moral integrity.
source: PAP Nauka w Polsce
COMMERCIAL BREAK
New articles in section Skills and knowledge
A heuristic trap in media coverage. How loud headlines boost fear
Bartłomiej Dwornik
A negative message that rests on emotion lifts the sense of threat by 57%. Why do reports of a plane crash drive investors away from airline shares? Why do flood stories spark worry about the next deluge?The pattern is irrational yet clear and proven.
How LLMs are reshaping SEO. Smart content strategies for the age of AI
BDw
For years, SEO was a fairly predictable game. Pick the right keywords, optimize your content, and watch your website climb the rankings. But today, a silent revolution is underway - and it`s being led by large language models (LLMs) like ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, and DeepSeek.
Chronemics, or The Language of Time. What Your Watch Says About You
Bartłomiej Dwornik
You walk in on time, glance at your watch, wait five minutes, then leave. Someone else is thirty minutes late and acts like they had to wait for you. Time in communication is a tool, a weapon, and a status marker. Welcome to the world of chronemics. The study of how time affects human relationships.
See articles on a similar topic:
How to Write an Article That Google Loves and People Understand
Bartłomiej Dwornik
The order of priorities in this guide's title is intentional. In 2024, to reach a larger audience, you must first convince the algorithms to display your content to readers. First - the article must be factually sound. Second - it should look appealing and be easy to read. We’ll focus on the latter.
Common Mistakes in Creating Content for Websites
Bartłomiej Dwornik
What mistakes should you avoid at all costs to ensure that the often costly work of attracting traffic from Google doesn’t go to waste? Check out the insights from experts asked by Interaktywnie.com in the recently published report "Search Engine Marketing."
Visual tricks. How to influence people with color, shape and composition
Bartłomiej Dwornik
The human brain supposedly processes images up to 60,000 times faster than words. Bright colors catch the eye more - but only under certain conditions. Few people can resist the "Apache Method," and a bearded man sells better. Here are some tricks for graphical-optical mind hacking.
Betteridge's Law. Is every headline with a question mark a gimmick?
Krzysztof Fiedorek
Betteridge's Law is a journalism hypothesis suggesting that any headline ending with a question mark can be answered with “no.” This rule applies to yes-or-no questions. It wasn’t actually created by Ian Betteridge and… it’s mostly untrue.