illustration: DALL-EFor the human species, creating lasting relationships, knowing who is worth cooperating with and who to avoid, is valuable. Evolution has equipped us with skills that enable us to assess the moral actions of others. One element of such an assessment may be determining how likely it is that someone will deceive us. This approach implies that people who declare themselves moral and then act differently - may pose a threat.
Studies conducted on adults have shown that people who exhibit moral hypocrisy, that is, people who not only act immorally, but also in a way that contradicts what they declare, are judged as worse than people who are immoral but honest about it. Many studies indicate that such hypocrites are judged worse than people whose behaviour does not contradict their declared opinions, being perceived as deceitful and untrustworthy.
Scientists have long observed that children are particularly sensitive to immoral behaviour in others and prefer pro-social attitudes. However, few studies determine whether children are able to recognize moral hypocrisy and how it affects their judgment, which is why scientists from SWPS University decided to look into this issue. They conducted three experiments as part of the study, and published their results in the journal Developmental Science.
The scientists worked with children aged 4-6. In one experiment, preschoolers watched a video featuring animal-shaped puppets, one of which was building a tower of blocks and the other would then destroy it. One of the puppets represented an attitude of moral hypocrisy, and thus seemingly followed moral norms, but its behaviour contradicted this.
By switching roles in the scenes, the scientists were able to confirm the hypotheses: children assessed hypocrites more negatively than characters who simply behaved inappropriately by destroying buildings, and what`s more - the assessment of the entire event involving the former was more negative.
The experiment confirmed that children distinguish hypocrites from other people and, like adults, assess them more negatively. The second experiment showed, in turn, that hypocrites are perceived as worse due to the contradictory signals they send to their surroundings.
The work of scientists from USWPS contributes new knowledge to research on human morality, including the theory of moral hypocrisy.
– It is also crucial to understand the significance of negative assessment of such people in the context of undertaking cooperation. Moral hypocrisy threatens group work by undermining trust. In addition, hypocrites who send misleading signals disrupt the integrity of the group, which is essential for cooperation – explained Katarzyna Myślińska-Szarek, PhD, from the Faculty of Psychology in Sopot at SWPS University, who conducted the research together with Wiesław Baryła, PhD, a professor at SWPS University.
The researchers point out that it is worth looking at the results of the experiments more broadly, e.g. in terms of building social trust. Early detection of hypocrisy may be an important cognitive function, enabling children to better distinguish between trustworthy and untrustworthy people in their environment. Similar sensitivity may result from the need to accurately recognize allies.
The scientists conclude that authenticity and consistency in moral education of the youngest children are also very important, and caregivers should be mindful of their actions being consistent with their declarations, because - as it turns out - children are discerning observers of moral integrity.
source: PAP Nauka w Polsce
COMMERCIAL BREAK
New articles in section Skills and knowledge
Audience mismatch. When and why short videos ruin a Youtube channel
KF × Gemini Deep Research
Shorts viewers stay in "swipe mode" and expect instant gratification. Watching a 30-minute documentary requires an active decision to click and a willingness for longer engagement. In specific situations, these mixed signals can seriously harm a Youtube channel.
How to reliably report uncertain data. A scientific meta-analysis
KFi
Numbers and mathematical intervals have a calming effect on news consumers. Political views, intelligence levels, or reader education do not alter how people process information about incomplete knowledge. Here are the results of dozens of media experiments regarding trust in the press.
Artificial intelligence in film and tv production. McKinsey report
Krzysztof Fiedorek
Global spending on video content has reached $180 billion, and the average viewer consumes it for 7.5 hours a day. Streaming is growing by 13%, while traditional television is losing 4% annually. As much as 84% of the US market is controlled by the seven largest players. Additionally, AI technology is reshuffling the market.
See articles on a similar topic:
How to Write an Article That Google Loves and People Understand
Bartłomiej Dwornik
The order of priorities in this guide's title is intentional. In 2024, to reach a larger audience, you must first convince the algorithms to display your content to readers. First - the article must be factually sound. Second - it should look appealing and be easy to read. We’ll focus on the latter.
Writing for the Web. The 4x4 Rule for Content Optimization
Bartłomiej Dwornik
How do you craft a Google-friendly title, what’s the ideal article length, and how often should you use keywords? A guide for those writing for websites.
It's Easier to Lie and Swear in Foreign Language. Here is Scientific Proof
Ewelina Krajczyńska-Wujec
A decision made based on data presented in a learned foreign language may be different than if you made it based on data in your native language. Language changes the intensity of felt emotions, and it affects the ability to analyse problems and choose solutions, according to research by Rafał Muda, PhD.
Video, Photo, or Text? What Really Works in Social Campaigns
KFi
Can ecology go viral? How can complex environmental issues be communicated in an engaging and effective way? A study by Wenye Mao and Yuko Nishide from Tohoku University analyzes two elements of narrative strategy: the type of medium (posts, posters, videos) and the mode of storytelling (individual vs. group).





























