28.04.2025 Media industry
User Generated Content. A minefield for journalists and media
Krzysztof Fiedorek
Over 40% of internet users judge information credibility by likes and views. Only 20% use traditional news channels as a main and first source. A Reuters Institute report highlights the scale and risks of User Generated Content and offers advice on how media can avoid falling into its trap.
w wydaniu polskim
ilustracja: DALL-EUser Generated Content, or UGC, is changing the way news is created. It offers quick access to information from places traditional journalists often cannot reach. However, the report “The Importance of UGC Verification in Building Trust in News” by Reuters Institute makes it clear: without rigorous UGC verification, media risk losing audience trust.
We fear false information
Audiences are less likely to visit newspaper websites directly or use news apps. Reuters Institute data shows that in 2024 only 20% of users still choose traditional news access channels as a main and first source. Most seek information on TikTok, WhatsApp, or YouTube.
In the same study, 59% of respondents admitted they worry about the truthfulness of online content. Fear of disinformation is growing, and audiences are witnessing more false news.
| Topic | Percentage |
|---|---|
| Politics | 36% |
| COVID-19 | 30% |
| Cost of living crisis | 28% |
| Israeli-Palestinian conflict | 27% |
| War in Ukraine | 24% |
| Climate and environment | 23% |
| Migration | 21% |
It is important to note that the topics where false content appears most often are socially and politically emotional. Politics, the pandemic, wars, and the economic crisis - in these areas disinformation can lead to real social tensions.
Popularity over credibility
UNESCO research shows that 41.6% of internet users assess the truthfulness of content based on its popularity - the number of likes and views. This means that a large part of users trust what is "trending" rather than what is verified. In practice, this promotes the spread of unverified materials, which reach public awareness faster than verified news.
Reuters points out that media must work even faster and more accurately in this reality. Otherwise, they risk becoming a channel for disinformation.
The report recalls a loud example from 2020, when during the conflict on the India-Pakistan border, a video allegedly showing a military attack went viral. In reality, it was footage from the video game "Arma 2".
False information that quickly gained popularity fueled tensions between countries and showed how easily UGC can affect public opinion if media do not implement proper verification procedures.
Model verification: earthquake in Japan
Reuters cites an example of successful verification during the earthquake in Ishikawa, Japan, at the beginning of 2024. A video showing a landslide quickly appeared on social platforms. The Reuters Visual Verification Team immediately took action:
- checked the file`s metadata (date, location, device),
- contacted the author and obtained the original,
- compared the landscape with Google Street View images,
- confirmed the authenticity of the place with current satellite photos.
This multilayered approach allowed Reuters to quickly and confidently verify the footage. Direct contact with the author and thorough checking of spatial data prevented the spread of a false report.
The scale of the problem keeps growing
Reuters does not hide that the scale of challenges related to UGC is growing faster than the technological capabilities of newsrooms. UNESCO reported that 62% of digital creators admit to sharing content without checking its authenticity.
Additionally, the development of artificial intelligence means more realistic deepfakes are emerging. According to a Reuters Institute study, respondents fear that within five years artificially generated images and videos will be indistinguishable from real ones.
How newsrooms should act - specific recommendations and an example
Reuters proposes a set of specific actions that newsrooms should implement when working with UGC:
- Verify metadata: Every recording should be analyzed for date, place, and device type. Example: after the earthquake in Japan, metadata confirmed the video matched the time of the event.
- Check the event location: Use Google Street View, satellite images, and maps to compare the landscape with the recording. In Japan, the terrain matched the Google Maps topography.
- Contact the author of the recording: Obtain original files. Without talking to the author, there can be no certainty about the source`s authenticity.
- Combine technological analysis with journalistic work: Technology is a tool, but it is the journalist who draws the final conclusion about the credibility of the content.
- Create global verification teams: Reuters ensures 24/7 content checking thanks to teams in Beijing, Bangalore, Gdansk, London, Mexico City, and Singapore. This way, local events quickly reach verification.
Example of action: when an amateur video appeared after the earthquake in Japan, Reuters confirmed its authenticity within a few hours by combining a conversation with the author, metadata analysis, and comparisons with photographic documentation of the area. Such procedures should become standard wherever newsrooms work with user-generated materials.
* * *
The report “The Importance of UGC Verification in Building Trust in News” is based on data from the Reuters Institute Digital News Report 2024, UNESCO research, and case analysis of UGC verification. It uses specific examples and the experiences of the Reuters Visual Verification team. The full report is available for free at https://go.reuters.com/LP=84
COMMERCIAL BREAK
New articles in section Media industry
Algorithmic personalization study. Who and how understands digital media
KFi
Most internet users believe that everyone sees the same content online. Meanwhile, algorithms personalize messages so effectively that a young woman with higher education receives different information than her father. Researchers reveal who truly understands the mechanisms.
Digital media addiction. Why the brain can’t cope
KFi
Digital media can hijack the brain's reward system in ways similar to drugs and alcohol, warned psychiatrist and author Anna Lembke. She emphasized that compulsive use of digital platforms can become a serious addiction. Not just a bad habit or risky behavior.
Women in media 2025. Editorial power knows no equality
KFi
Only 27% of editors-in-chief in the media are women, even though they make up 40% of journalists. In 9 out of 12 countries studied by the Reuters Institute, women in media are less likely to get promoted. It seems that equality in newsrooms is lagging behind broader society. And the gaps go much further.
See articles on a similar topic:
Information bubbles. Study of Instagram, Tik Tok and You Tube users
Urszula Kaczorowska
A staggering 96 percent of the time people spend online is spent on anything but consuming information. This, says Professor Magdalena Wojcieszak means ‘we have over-inflated the issue of information bubbles and disinformation.’
Social Media in 2025. Generational Differences Are Crystal Clear
KFi
More and more people are saying they’re cutting back on time spent on social media. And while this doesn’t mean a mass exodus, the trend is clear. According to latest GWI report, 31% of users said they had reduced their social media use. There’s also a subtle frustration.
Fake News and Disinformation in Poland. Scale, Impact and Future
Bartłomiej Dwornik
Where do the sources of disinformation lie, and how large is the scale of this wave? Why are we so susceptible to false information, and what role do traditional media play in this puzzle? Let’s shed some light on these issues and face the question: can the battle against the flood of disinformation still be won?
Radio, Streaming, and Podcasts. Total Audio 2024 Report about Poland
Krzysztof Fiedorek
Audio content is a daily companion for Poles. According to the Total Audio 2024 study conducted by Adres:Media on behalf of the Radio Research Committee, as many as 90% of respondents listen to audio content at least once a week, and 80% do so daily. The average listening time is nearly five hours per day.
