po polsku
illustration: DALL-EThat`s not fringe talk. It`s mainstream. Poland ranks 11th globally for greenwashing mentions in major online news sources.
Critics allege that as many as 42% of ESG-related claims are misleading. They accuse firms of selective transparency - flaunting eco-friendly highlights while burying environmental shortcomings. It`s a trust issue. When nearly 90% of surveyed business representatives admit they lack proper ESG knowledge, opponents weaponize this to discredit entire reporting efforts.
As Sebastian Bykowski, IMM’s Vice President warns, disinformation undermines all companies - even those genuinely trying to improve. The chaos is fueled by social media algorithms and generative AI, which amplify controversy and allow fake content to spread at warp speed.
From compliance to confusion - ESG’s growing pains
Despite ESG being enshrined in EU’s Omnibus Directive - binding on firms with over 1,000 employees and €50M+ in revenue or €25M in assets - 45% of companies still don’t know if it applies to them. Meanwhile, media attention is exploding: from 14,600 ESG-related mentions in Q1 2024 to 23,100 in Q1 2025. That’s a 58% leap.
There were 70 ESG-themed events in the last quarter alone, 90% of them free. Yet this informational boom has not translated into widespread understanding. Instead, it created a perfect storm for disinformation to thrive.
The ESG and the ideological skirmish
ESG has become a political football. Both the far left and right now weaponize it for ideological gain. Add to that a media environment dominated by clickbait and vague headlines, and what you get is confusion instead of clarity - skepticism instead of progress.
According to the 19th edition of the "Global Risks Perception Survey", fake news is now considered among the leading threats to global stability. For ESG-driven firms, the consequences are real: lost trust, legal exposure, reputational crises, talent drain, falling brand value - and potentially, existential danger.
IMM’s report "Disinformation about ESG in the media. Facts and myths" was unveiled at the Grand ESG conference by Fundacja Grand Press on May 9, 2025. Download the full report here.
How the media talk (or stay silent) about climate
The report "Climate Change and News Audiences 2024", published earlier this year by Reuters Institute, shows that audience engagement with climate topics has remained almost unchanged for several years.
Climate misinformation remains a significant issue. Interestingly, misinformation sources vary widely, with politicians and celebrities among the most frequently indicated.
| Source of Misinformation | Percentage of Respondents |
|---|---|
| Politicians and political parties | 12% |
| Governments | 11% |
| Celebrities | 10% |
| Climate activists | 10% |
| Scientists | 8% |
| International institutions | 8% |
| Energy companies | 8% |
| Friends and family | 7% |
| Charitable organizations | 6% |
| Religious leaders | 6% |
The problem is not only the emergence of false content but also its dissemination by public figures and influential groups. The high number of mentions of politicians and celebrities as misinformation sources shows that major media players are not always responsible for misleading the public.
COMMERCIAL BREAK
New articles in section Media industry
Paid journalistic content. Market trends and forecasts by Reuters Institute
Krzysztof Fiedorek
Only 18 percent of internet users pay for online news access, and the rate has not increased for the third year in a row. Norway sets records with 42%, while Greece does not exceed 7%. Globally, nearly one in three subscribers cancels after a year.
Gen Alpha avoids tough topics. What young people are really looking for
Krzysztof Fiedorek
Generation Alpha prefers humor in 46% of cases, while only 12% are interested in news and political topics. Young people and children consciously limit what negatively affects their emotions - according to the report "Gen Alpha Unfiltered" published by GWI.
YouTube redefines viewer engagement. Goodbye to returning viewers
KFi
As many as 30% of internet users now turn to YouTube as their main news source, and 65% consume news in video form. Now the platform is shaking things up. Reach still matters, but engagement is what really counts.
See articles on a similar topic:
Information bubbles. Study of Instagram, Tik Tok and You Tube users
Urszula Kaczorowska
A staggering 96 percent of the time people spend online is spent on anything but consuming information. This, says Professor Magdalena Wojcieszak means ‘we have over-inflated the issue of information bubbles and disinformation.’
Journalism and Technology. How Indian Newspapers Fight to Survive
KFi
The COVID-19 pandemic accelerated the transformation of India's press industry. Traditional print media, forced to fight for survival, adopted modern technologies ranging from data analysis to artificial intelligence. How do journalists adapt to new roles, and how do media redefine their future in the digital age? Researchers from the Symbiosis Institute of Media & Communication have explored these questions.
Influencers Earn Too Much. No Fluff Jobs Report
KrzysztoF
According to nearly 70% of Poles, influencers earn too much, and 54% feel the least affection for them out of all professions. Only politicians receive equally low regard among respondents surveyed by No Fluff Jobs. On the other hand, nurses and… farmers are considered underpaid.
Books, e-books and audiobooks about the media and for journalists [LINK]
AUTOPROMOCJA Reporterzy.info
Thanks to cooperation with the Amazon, we may suggest you wide offer of great reading opportunity. Studies on the history and media market, interviews, reports and photo guides. Ordering and delivering a book now only takes a few moments. We invite you for a good lecture!
