po polsku
illustration: DALL-EMore and more often, we feel like the internet has lost its soul. Discussion forums seem empty, and social media is flooded with the same repetitive content. What once was a space for authentic exchange of ideas now resembles a digital wasteland. These feelings fit into the increasingly popular dead internet theory. It suggests that most online content and interactions are no longer created by humans, but by bots and artificial intelligence.
Online traffic dominated by bots
Data seems to confirm these concerns. The latest "2025 Bad Bot Report", prepared by analysts at Imperva, sheds light on the real scale of this phenomenon. It turns out that in 2024, humans accounted for less than half of all internet traffic. It`s machines, not us, generating most of the activity online.
This might be shocking, but bots aren`t just spam in your inbox. These are advanced programs that create fake social media accounts, write comments, and even generate full articles. The rapid development of artificial intelligence has only accelerated this process, making it nearly impossible to tell humans from machines.
| Year | Human-generated traffic | Bot-generated traffic |
|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 49.0% | 51.0% |
| 2023 | 50.4% | 49.6% |
| 2022 | 52.6% | 47.4% |
| 2021 | 57.7% | 42.3% |
| 2020 | 59.2% | 40.8% |
This digital shift makes it harder and harder to find real, human opinions. Authentic user experiences are lost in a sea of artificially generated content. We all feel the consequences, even if we’re not fully aware of them. Our everyday online experience is degrading, and the internet is becoming less useful and trustworthy.
Fake reviews powered by AI
The issue of fake online reviews is one of the most tangible examples of digital inauthenticity. Global statistics are alarming. According to David Ehrentreu, who gathered key stats on Shapo.io, on average 30% of all online reviews are considered fake, and on some major platforms this rate may reach even 47%. This isn’t surprising, considering that 95% of internet users check reviews before buying, and reviews serve as "social proof" that is twelve times more trusted by customers than any other form of marketing.
The fake review phenomenon has evolved from manual operations to mass, automated AI-driven production. Tools like Scalenut Online Review Generator, which create "authentic"-sounding reviews, have drastically lowered the entry barrier for scammers.
According to The Transparency Company, AI-generated reviews have been growing 80% month-over-month since June 2023. Meanwhile, a report by Originality.ai found that in 2025, 23.7% of real estate agent reviews on Zillow were likely created by AI - a huge jump from just 3.63% in 2019.
CapitalOne Shopping Research estimates that this year, fake reviews will cost the average e-commerce customer $125. Globally, this fraud costs us $770 billion. The dead internet is no longer just a theory - it`s a very real cost. For every one of us.
Dead communities
From a global perspective, the social media platform most saturated with bots seems to be X (formerly Twitter). A study conducted in 2024 by Internet 2.0 using the 5th Column AI tool predicts that around 64% of all accounts on the platform are likely bots. Meanwhile, the BotNot team from Yofi.ai`s "flash experiment" from May 2022 estimated that between 24% and 37% of X`s daily active users were bot accounts. Although the methodologies differed, the trend of the internet "dying" is clearly visible over just two years.
But the issue affects all major social platforms. Data analysis shows there is no single consistent number defining the bot problem. This discrepancy stems from differences in research methodologies and the dynamic nature of bots themselves.
| Platform | Metric | Estimate | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| X (Twitter) | accounts | 5% | |
| active users | 24%-37% | Yofi.ai | |
| accounts | approx. 64% | 5th Column AI | |
| active users | >5% | META | |
| ads | 50%-70% | Reddit / industry research data | |
| active users | 4.75% | Basic Thinking | |
| accounts | 10% | MDPI | |
| TikTok | Deleted accounts | 171 million | Fake accounts removed in Q1 2024 |
| ads | 75%-97% | Fraud0.com |
Most importantly, there`s no unified definition of a "bot". Tech companies like Meta or X often use narrow definitions focused on "non-human accounts", often separating them from spam accounts. Independent researchers, on the other hand, use broader criteria, classifying accounts based on behavior patterns suggesting inauthenticity. As a result, platform-reported numbers are usually much lower than those from external sources. Companies have a clear interest in showing low numbers to maintain trust among advertisers and investors.
Disinformation
AI-driven disinformation was identified by the World Economic Forum in 2024 as a top short-term threat to global stability.Using the same content-creation tools as real users, bot armies can easily produce and widely spread fake news.
The scale of bot involvement in disinformation campaigns is massive. A study from the National Institute on Drug Abuse in Baltimore on COVID-19 disinformation found that up to 66% of bots actively discussed the virus. The findings were published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research.
In Poland, a report from the National Security Bureau showed that in the first months of 2024, a pro-Russian "bot army" (SDA) generated 33.9 million comments and nearly 40,000 content pieces on polarizing political and social topics. This highlights the scale and organized nature of such campaigns. Worldwide. Because the mechanisms are similar and can now easily be adapted to local contexts. And almost every topic can be framed in a polarizing way.
Internet for replacement?
Despite impressive technological progress, we won’t win the fight against the dead internet with algorithms alone. Technology is a double-edged sword. Bots are becoming more advanced, and social media algorithms promote content that generates engagement. In the end, the most effective line of defense remains our human ability to think critically.
Researchers are also studying the phenomenon. In the analysis "The Dead Internet Theory: A Survey on Artificial Interactions", published on ResearchGate, scientists examine how artificial interactions affect us and our behavior. The conclusions show growing user fatigue with inauthenticity and a search for more genuine online relationships.
In practice, this means we increasingly value niche communities, small internet forums, or private groups where we can still count on real contact with another human. That`s where, far from the noise of algorithms and bots, the internet still lives. For now.
COMMERCIAL BREAK
New articles in section Media industry
Who trusts articles written by artificial intelligence? Results of a study from China
Krzysztof Fiedorek
Young readers trust machines more than human writers. When they consume news, they prefer the cool objectivity of algorithms over human emotions. They believe that articles created by AI are objective. As they interact with these texts more frequently, they rarely notice any harmful biases in them.
Who really controls the news on the internet? A study from Spain
Krzysztof Fiedorek
Analysis of more than thirteen thousand articles reveals behind-the-scenes mechanisms of spanish digital media. Left-wing portals are responsible for 50.33 percent of texts on lobbying. The energy lobby generates 63.41 percent of publications. Only one daily newspaper evaluates pressure groups positively.
Children and artificial intelligence. The generation of a global experiment is growing
Joanna Sokołowska, UNICEF Polska
A UNICEF analysis based on new data from 10 countries shows that at least 20 million children have already used artificial intelligence (AI). Many of them are ahead of adults, adopting these technologies at a pace more than three times faster.
See articles on a similar topic:
Disinformation 2024. Major Threats According to the Global Risk Report
KrzysztoF
In 2024, the world will face several global threats, including disinformation, climate change, and armed conflicts. These three challenges will have a significant impact on the economy, society, and the environment. These findings come from the "Global Risks Report" by the World Economic Forum.
How Journalists Use Social Media
Bartłomiej Dwornik
Primarily, they seek inspiration from blogs and, less frequently, from Facebook. They rarely trust what they find, often approaching it with caution. Credibility does not necessarily correlate with attractiveness.
Television 2025. Report by the European Broadcasting Union
Krzysztof Fiedorek
Europeans are watching less and less television. In 2024, the average viewing time was 3 hours and 13 minutes per day. Only 54% of young people had any contact with TV, and public broadcasters held a 23% share. Television is losing relevance, especially among the youngest viewers.
Influencers 2024. Data, Facts, and Stories from the UNESCO Report
Krzysztof Fiedorek
As many as 68% of digital creators are nano-influencers. One in three has experienced hate speech, and over 60% do not thoroughly verify information before publishing. Moreover, only half disclose their content sponsors. The findings from the "Behind The Screens" report are both inspiring and alarming.
