27.11.2023 Law in media
Deepfake. A Powerful New Weapon in The Information War
Krzysztof Fiedorek
One of the newest threats to the credibility of information is deepfake technology. Deepfake is a type of false video or audio material where the person in the recording appears to speak or behave in a way that does not align with reality.
Deepfake technology uses machine learning algorithms to manipulate images and sounds. These algorithms are trained on massive data sets, such as videos and audio recordings, enabling them to imitate specific individuals with great accuracy.
Deepfake can be used for various purposes, both positive and negative. On one hand, it can be used for entertainment, such as creating comedy videos or parodies. On the other hand, deepfake can be used to manipulate public opinion or harm the reputations of public figures.
Deepfake. Real-life examples
The manipulative capabilities of this new technology are increasingly powerful, and the results are becoming more credible and harder to distinguish from real recordings or actual statements. Some of the most well-known examples used to spread misinformation and fuel conflicts include:
- Mark Zuckerberg, explaining that he has control over the world and our personal data;
- Barack Obama, making derogatory remarks about Donald Trump;
- Kim Kardashian, responding to her critics;
- Nancy Pelosi, allegedly intoxicated during a public appearance;
- Donald Trump, lecturing Belgians;
- Volodymyr Zelensky urging Ukrainian soldiers to lay down their arms.
New examples are rapidly emerging, increasingly well-crafted. In recent years, deepfake has been frequently used on social media, where videos spread virally. The danger lies in the fact that the information about their false origin cannot reach all viewers. The growing use of deepfake in political campaigns raises concerns and opposition, including in Poland.
Deepfake as a threat to democracy
Deepfake can pose a serious threat to democracy. This technology can be used to spread misinformation and manipulate public opinion.
For instance, deepfake could be used to create a fake video in which a politician says or does something they never actually said or did. Such a recording could damage their reputation or influence election outcomes.
Deepfake can also be used to intimidate or blackmail public figures. For example, it could be used to create a fake video in which a public figure appears as an adult film actor. Such a recording could then be used to blackmail them into specific actions.
How to recognize deepfake?
There are several ways to recognize deepfake. One is to pay attention to details in the image or sound. In the case of deepfake, certain irregularities may appear, such as:
- improper proportions of the face or body
- unnatural facial or mouth movements
- unnatural sounds
Another way to recognize deepfake is to check if the recording comes from a credible source. If the recording comes from an unknown source or is shared by unknown people, it is likely to be a deepfake.
How to combat deepfake?
There are several ways to combat deepfake. One is to educate the public about this technology. People should be aware of the threat posed by deepfake and should learn to recognize fake materials.
However, currently, only one in four EU residents reports having verified the authenticity of information found on social media or other internet sources. In Poland, this figure is significantly below the EU average—just 16%.
In our country, we also face another problem: a crisis of trust in traditional media. These should help verify the authenticity of information but are increasingly seen as sources of fake news themselves. This is due to various reasons, mainly political bias but also occasional lack of thorough research and... falling victim to fake news.
We have a problem assessing information credibility
A quarter of information consumers rely on sources where verifying credibility is a challenge. The real problem remains the issue of fake news. This is noted by 77% of respondents, with 51% admitting difficulty distinguishing between true and false information, according to the Deloitte Digital Consumer Trends survey.
Digital Poland`s February 2023 report reveals how effective social media is as a channel for spreading fakes:
- Fake news is 70% more likely to be shared.
- The result is that false information spreads six times faster than the truth.
Therefore, another—and perhaps the only effective—way to combat deepfake is to develop technology capable of detecting false materials. Currently, research is underway on artificial intelligence that could be used to recognize deepfake.
COMMERCIAL BREAK
See articles on a similar topic:
Local Media in Poland - Corrections
Bartłomiej Dwornik
The regulations regarding corrections are perhaps the most frequently violated rule in Polish media. There is a clear division between those who never admit to mistakes and those who can humbly accept their faults.
Hate in the Polish Internet. IRCenter Study
Krzysztof Fiedorek
The proportion of hate speech victims is inversely proportional to the age of internet users. The study authors point out that this is directly influenced by the fact that older generations are instilled with the principles of respectful discussion and use the internet less frequently.
How to Detect Pegasus on Your Phone and Protect Against Spying
RINF
The nature of spyware is to remain as hidden as possible, making it difficult to detect on a device. However, some mechanisms can help verify if a smartphone has been compromised.
Unsolved Journalist Murders: CPJ Report 2024
KFi
Haiti and Israel have topped the latest report by the Committee to Protect Journalists (CPJ) on impunity in journalist murders. Worldwide, 80% of cases remain unsolved. The report explores why those who kill journalists evade accountability, highlighting the countries leading this grim statistic and its impact on press freedom.
Local Media in Poland - Workshop and Ethics
Bartłomiej Dwornik
Every day, journalists face the dilemma of whether to report on something or to omit it. Where does information end, and where does violation of privacy begin?
What Data Google Collects. Privacy on the Internet
KF
According to a gs.statcounter.com report – May 2018, Google captures over 97% of internet users. Currently, many free applications are available to users. What does Google collect? When using the most popular search engine, we should be aware of how our data is collected and used.
Cyberwarfare on the Internet. The ESET Report
KF
Governments, corporations, and even the education sector are becoming targets of advanced cyber attacks. The report for the period from October 2023 to March 2024, prepared by ESET, sheds light on the intensification of activities by Advanced Persistent Threat (APT) groups, which conduct espionage, sabotage, and destabilization operations in key sectors on behalf of states.