illustration: bing.com/createTo date, few studies have analyzed whether moral judgments, such as how we assess someone’s behavior in a given situation, are influenced by group pressure. This topic was explored by researchers from SWPS University in collaboration with the University of Sussex and the University of Kent. The scientists also investigated how opinions about others` behavior change under the influence of avatars in virtual reality.
In the first study, the researchers examined how much participants - 103 people in total - would change their private moral judgments to align with others. First, participants independently assessed specific behaviors, such as a woman scolding her child for a bad grade in school or a man loudly answering his phone during a movie. Later, they evaluated the same behaviors in the presence of three people who responded differently than the participant.
- Participants adjusted their opinions to align with others in 43% of cases.
- However, they did so less frequently when judgments involved harm to others.
Artificial Intelligence Has Persuasive Power
In the second study, the experiment was repeated with 138 participants in a virtual environment. First, each participant individually assessed others` behavior in a given situation. Later, after putting on VR goggles, they repeated this evaluation in the presence of three avatars in virtual reality.
Some avatars were supposedly controlled by humans, while others were controlled by artificial intelligence. In the latter case, participants were informed that the Faculty of Engineering and Digital Arts at the University of Kent was testing three new algorithms implemented in the avatars.
- Participants adjusted their assessments to match those of avatars controlled by humans in 30% of cases.
- They behaved similarly in 26% of cases when the avatars were controlled by AI.
- "We usually adapt our opinions to match those of others for two reasons. First, we succumb to group pressure and seek social acceptance. Second, we may feel that we lack sufficient knowledge and view the group as a source that better interprets the current situation," explains Dr. Konrad Bocian from the Institute of Psychology at SWPS University. - "The results suggest that judgments regarding moral behavior, like other evaluations we make, are subject to pressure from both real and virtual groups."
Group Pressure as a Tool
The researchers emphasize the need for further studies to determine the extent to which digital groups can influence others` judgments. This is particularly important in the context of the rapidly evolving digital communication landscape, which may soon move into various metaverses.
Using group pressure to influence individual moral judgments in the virtual world could be used for both good and bad purposes. That’s why understanding these influence mechanisms is so crucial. Only through deeper knowledge can we increase the awareness of participants in virtual worlds regarding the influence others may exert on them.
The study was published in PLOS One:
Moral conformity in a digital world: Human and nonhuman agents as a source of social pressure for judgments of moral character
COMMERCIAL BREAK
New articles in section Skills and knowledge
Audience mismatch. When and why short videos ruin a Youtube channel
KF × Gemini Deep Research
Shorts viewers stay in "swipe mode" and expect instant gratification. Watching a 30-minute documentary requires an active decision to click and a willingness for longer engagement. In specific situations, these mixed signals can seriously harm a Youtube channel.
How to reliably report uncertain data. A scientific meta-analysis
KFi
Numbers and mathematical intervals have a calming effect on news consumers. Political views, intelligence levels, or reader education do not alter how people process information about incomplete knowledge. Here are the results of dozens of media experiments regarding trust in the press.
Artificial intelligence in film and tv production. McKinsey report
Krzysztof Fiedorek
Global spending on video content has reached $180 billion, and the average viewer consumes it for 7.5 hours a day. Streaming is growing by 13%, while traditional television is losing 4% annually. As much as 84% of the US market is controlled by the seven largest players. Additionally, AI technology is reshuffling the market.
See articles on a similar topic:
Psychology of Politics: Extremism
Krzysztof Dowgird
The term "extremist," according to the dictionary definition, refers to "a person with extreme views, a radical, an advocate of extreme, ultimate measures." In relation to political extremism, this means, first, views of an extreme nature (including approval for the use of force to solve political problems).
Visual tricks. How to influence people with color, shape and composition
Bartłomiej Dwornik
The human brain supposedly processes images up to 60,000 times faster than words. Bright colors catch the eye more - but only under certain conditions. Few people can resist the "Apache Method," and a bearded man sells better. Here are some tricks for graphical-optical mind hacking.
Betteridge's Law. Is every headline with a question mark a gimmick?
Krzysztof Fiedorek
Betteridge's Law is a journalism hypothesis suggesting that any headline ending with a question mark can be answered with “no.” This rule applies to yes-or-no questions. It wasn’t actually created by Ian Betteridge and… it’s mostly untrue.
How ChatGPT, Google Gemini, and Other Large Language Models Work
Krzysztof Fiedorek
These powerful algorithms can generate text, translate languages, write various types of creative content, and answer your questions in a way that often feels like a conversation with a person. But how is it possible for a machine to mimic human intelligence so well?




























