po polsku
illustration: bing.com/createTo date, few studies have analyzed whether moral judgments, such as how we assess someone’s behavior in a given situation, are influenced by group pressure. This topic was explored by researchers from SWPS University in collaboration with the University of Sussex and the University of Kent. The scientists also investigated how opinions about others` behavior change under the influence of avatars in virtual reality.
In the first study, the researchers examined how much participants - 103 people in total - would change their private moral judgments to align with others. First, participants independently assessed specific behaviors, such as a woman scolding her child for a bad grade in school or a man loudly answering his phone during a movie. Later, they evaluated the same behaviors in the presence of three people who responded differently than the participant.
- Participants adjusted their opinions to align with others in 43% of cases.
- However, they did so less frequently when judgments involved harm to others.
Artificial Intelligence Has Persuasive Power
In the second study, the experiment was repeated with 138 participants in a virtual environment. First, each participant individually assessed others` behavior in a given situation. Later, after putting on VR goggles, they repeated this evaluation in the presence of three avatars in virtual reality.
Some avatars were supposedly controlled by humans, while others were controlled by artificial intelligence. In the latter case, participants were informed that the Faculty of Engineering and Digital Arts at the University of Kent was testing three new algorithms implemented in the avatars.
- Participants adjusted their assessments to match those of avatars controlled by humans in 30% of cases.
- They behaved similarly in 26% of cases when the avatars were controlled by AI.
- "We usually adapt our opinions to match those of others for two reasons. First, we succumb to group pressure and seek social acceptance. Second, we may feel that we lack sufficient knowledge and view the group as a source that better interprets the current situation," explains Dr. Konrad Bocian from the Institute of Psychology at SWPS University. - "The results suggest that judgments regarding moral behavior, like other evaluations we make, are subject to pressure from both real and virtual groups."
Group Pressure as a Tool
The researchers emphasize the need for further studies to determine the extent to which digital groups can influence others` judgments. This is particularly important in the context of the rapidly evolving digital communication landscape, which may soon move into various metaverses.
Using group pressure to influence individual moral judgments in the virtual world could be used for both good and bad purposes. That’s why understanding these influence mechanisms is so crucial. Only through deeper knowledge can we increase the awareness of participants in virtual worlds regarding the influence others may exert on them.
The study was published in PLOS One:
Moral conformity in a digital world: Human and nonhuman agents as a source of social pressure for judgments of moral character
COMMERCIAL BREAK
New articles in section Skills and knowledge
Audience mismatch. When and why short videos ruin a Youtube channel
KF × Gemini Deep Research
Shorts viewers stay in "swipe mode" and expect instant gratification. Watching a 30-minute documentary requires an active decision to click and a willingness for longer engagement. In specific situations, these mixed signals can seriously harm a Youtube channel.
How to reliably report uncertain data. A scientific meta-analysis
KFi
Numbers and mathematical intervals have a calming effect on news consumers. Political views, intelligence levels, or reader education do not alter how people process information about incomplete knowledge. Here are the results of dozens of media experiments regarding trust in the press.
Artificial intelligence in film and tv production. McKinsey report
Krzysztof Fiedorek
Global spending on video content has reached $180 billion, and the average viewer consumes it for 7.5 hours a day. Streaming is growing by 13%, while traditional television is losing 4% annually. As much as 84% of the US market is controlled by the seven largest players. Additionally, AI technology is reshuffling the market.
See articles on a similar topic:
Sarcasm in Communication. A Study by INSEAD Researchers
Krzysztof Fiedorek
Sarcasm can be a valuable tool in interpersonal communication, but its effectiveness depends on the context and the relationship between the sender and the receiver. Researchers at INSEAD have shown that well-utilized sarcasm can be a powerful asset in business language and advertising.
How to Write an Article That Google Loves and People Understand
Bartłomiej Dwornik
The order of priorities in this guide's title is intentional. In 2024, to reach a larger audience, you must first convince the algorithms to display your content to readers. First - the article must be factually sound. Second - it should look appealing and be easy to read. We’ll focus on the latter.
AI slops and microtargeting. Why wou should NOT LIKE the bread horse
Bartłomiej Dwornik
"I grew this garlic chive all by myself on the windowsill. But I bet you won't congratulate me." Do you also see an influx of such posts in online communities? Be careful. This is called AI slop (or Boomer Trap), and it is NOT just a harmless game or entertainment. It is a well-thought-out mechanism in which the currency is you. First, your time and engagement. And soon, your money.
It's Easier to Lie and Swear in Foreign Language. Here is Scientific Proof
Ewelina Krajczyńska-Wujec
A decision made based on data presented in a learned foreign language may be different than if you made it based on data in your native language. Language changes the intensity of felt emotions, and it affects the ability to analyse problems and choose solutions, according to research by Rafał Muda, PhD.
