
User Generated Content, or UGC, is changing the way news is created. It offers quick access to information from places traditional journalists often cannot reach. However, the report “The Importance of UGC Verification in Building Trust in News” by Reuters Institute makes it clear: without rigorous UGC verification, media risk losing audience trust.
We fear false information
Audiences are less likely to visit newspaper websites directly or use news apps. Reuters Institute data shows that in 2024 only 20% of users still choose traditional news access channels as a main and first source. Most seek information on TikTok, WhatsApp, or YouTube.
In the same study, 59% of respondents admitted they worry about the truthfulness of online content. Fear of disinformation is growing, and audiences are witnessing more false news.
Topic | Percentage |
---|---|
Politics | 36% |
COVID-19 | 30% |
Cost of living crisis | 28% |
Israeli-Palestinian conflict | 27% |
War in Ukraine | 24% |
Climate and environment | 23% |
Migration | 21% |
It is important to note that the topics where false content appears most often are socially and politically emotional. Politics, the pandemic, wars, and the economic crisis - in these areas disinformation can lead to real social tensions.
Popularity over credibility
UNESCO research shows that 41.6% of internet users assess the truthfulness of content based on its popularity - the number of likes and views. This means that a large part of users trust what is "trending" rather than what is verified. In practice, this promotes the spread of unverified materials, which reach public awareness faster than verified news.
Reuters points out that media must work even faster and more accurately in this reality. Otherwise, they risk becoming a channel for disinformation.
The report recalls a loud example from 2020, when during the conflict on the India-Pakistan border, a video allegedly showing a military attack went viral. In reality, it was footage from the video game "Arma 2".
False information that quickly gained popularity fueled tensions between countries and showed how easily UGC can affect public opinion if media do not implement proper verification procedures.
Model verification: earthquake in Japan
Reuters cites an example of successful verification during the earthquake in Ishikawa, Japan, at the beginning of 2024. A video showing a landslide quickly appeared on social platforms. The Reuters Visual Verification Team immediately took action:
- checked the file`s metadata (date, location, device),
- contacted the author and obtained the original,
- compared the landscape with Google Street View images,
- confirmed the authenticity of the place with current satellite photos.
This multilayered approach allowed Reuters to quickly and confidently verify the footage. Direct contact with the author and thorough checking of spatial data prevented the spread of a false report.
The scale of the problem keeps growing
Reuters does not hide that the scale of challenges related to UGC is growing faster than the technological capabilities of newsrooms. UNESCO reported that 62% of digital creators admit to sharing content without checking its authenticity.
Additionally, the development of artificial intelligence means more realistic deepfakes are emerging. According to a Reuters Institute study, respondents fear that within five years artificially generated images and videos will be indistinguishable from real ones.
How newsrooms should act - specific recommendations and an example
Reuters proposes a set of specific actions that newsrooms should implement when working with UGC:
- Verify metadata: Every recording should be analyzed for date, place, and device type. Example: after the earthquake in Japan, metadata confirmed the video matched the time of the event.
- Check the event location: Use Google Street View, satellite images, and maps to compare the landscape with the recording. In Japan, the terrain matched the Google Maps topography.
- Contact the author of the recording: Obtain original files. Without talking to the author, there can be no certainty about the source`s authenticity.
- Combine technological analysis with journalistic work: Technology is a tool, but it is the journalist who draws the final conclusion about the credibility of the content.
- Create global verification teams: Reuters ensures 24/7 content checking thanks to teams in Beijing, Bangalore, Gdansk, London, Mexico City, and Singapore. This way, local events quickly reach verification.
Example of action: when an amateur video appeared after the earthquake in Japan, Reuters confirmed its authenticity within a few hours by combining a conversation with the author, metadata analysis, and comparisons with photographic documentation of the area. Such procedures should become standard wherever newsrooms work with user-generated materials.
* * *
The report “The Importance of UGC Verification in Building Trust in News” is based on data from the Reuters Institute Digital News Report 2024, UNESCO research, and case analysis of UGC verification. It uses specific examples and the experiences of the Reuters Visual Verification team. The full report is available for free at https://go.reuters.com/LP=84
COMMERCIAL BREAK
New articles in section Media industry
Most medical influencer posts on TikTok are FALSE
KFi
Researchers from East Carolina University Health Medical Center analysed 120 TikTok videos tagged with hashtags such as #naturalparenting, #antivaccine, and #holistichealth. The results of their study leave no doubt.
Dead internet theory is a fact. Bots now outnumber people online
Krzysztof Fiedorek
Already 51% of global internet traffic is generated by bots, not people. As many as two-thirds of accounts on X are likely bots, and on review platforms, three out of ten reviews weren't written by a human. Do you feel something is off online? It's not paranoia. In 2025, it's a reality.
The most valuable female personal brands in Polish fashion. IMM report
KFi
The ten most popular people in Poland in the "fashion" category generate over 1.5 billion contacts across all types of media in a year. Their value is nearly 400 million zlotys. The ranking was prepared by the Institute of Media Monitoring for "Forbes Women" magazine.
See articles on a similar topic:
Media in Poland 2022. How Poles Watch, Listen, Read, and Surf the Web
Krzysztof Fiedorek
Nearly two million Poles have access to a TV but do not watch television. For radio, the analogous group amounts to 8% of radio owners. Two-thirds of Poles reach for printed press, even occasionally, while the number of mobile internet users exceeds desktop users by nearly three million.
Future of Public Media. Who Will Be Data Ethicists and VR Designers?
KFi
How does the future of work in media look? Here are professions that do not yet exist but will soon become essential. The report "Future Jobs at PSM: Competencies and Professions for the Media of Tomorrow," prepared by the European Broadcasting Union (EBU) and Rai Ufficio Studi, outlines key changes awaiting the public media sector in the coming years.
The Deadliest Year for Journalism. 124 Fatalities in 2024
Krzysztof Fiedorek
The year 2024 was the deadliest for media professionals since the Committee to Protect Journalists began tracking these statistics. The tragic figures, published in CPJs latest special report, reached record highs in most monitored categories.
Mass Media in Poland
Agnieszka Osińska
Into the decade of years 90. Poland entered with media national, subjected to the political control. Starting from the half of 1989 our media market underwent transformations, biggest probably from the time of the World War II.