po polsku
illustration: DALL-EA fake image of comet 3I/ATLAS once again proved how easily the internet can turn a simple astronomical observation into a sci-fi story. This viral shows the mechanism in pure form: the more prestigious the supposed source appears, the faster belief in the attractive fiction spreads.
Emotions over evidence. How a viral begins
Researchers from Warsaw University of Technology emphasize in the "Analysis of polarization and inoculation mechanisms (PW/UJ/SWPS)" that algorithms favor bold and flashy content. Images from Hubble and ESA show an ordinary comet: a blurry coma and a tail reflecting light. But they lack that visual "hook" that gives meme potential. A viral acts like a lens — it magnifies what is easy to remember, even if false.
To show the difference between an attractive fake and a real observation, it’s worth comparing two images from the "Analysis...":
| Image type | Visual features | Reception effect |
|---|---|---|
| Authentic telescope photos | Blurry coma, dust tail, no sharp edges | Lower "clickability" |
| Viral images | Sharpened contours, added "metallic" elements | Increased engagement and false interpretations |
So, we see that manipulation doesn`t have to be sophisticated. Just a few visual tricks are enough for viewers to feel they’re seeing "something extraordinary."
Bubbles, bridges, and leaps. How opinions spread
The model described by researchers from PW in the "Analysis of polarization and inoculation mechanisms" works like a map of social dynamics. It shows two camps connected by bridges — channels of real influence. When bridges are weak, groups stay in their own worlds. When they become too strong, a leap occurs: the entire network adopts a sharp, unified message, regardless of its truth.
This pattern is well illustrated by examples from public health disputes. If one side dominates communication, the other responds with pushback. This leads to waves of trends and countertrends.
What fuels polarization:
- aggressive campaigns targeting only one group,
- poor-quality bridges (lack of trusted intermediaries),
- emotional asymmetry — one side admires, the other rejects,
- lack of preventive education about manipulation.
Researchers show that it’s not the presence of different opinions that raises tensions, but how groups are connected.
Inoculation. How psychological "vaccines" work
Part of the report by UJ describes the inoculation mechanism: a brief training that warns recipients about typical manipulation tricks. The analysis includes exercises that reduce the effect of first impressions and help distinguish falsehood from interpretation.
A real example of such a "vaccine" is the campaign for seniors "Grandma, Grandpa… don’t be fooled." It warns about tricks before a scam appears. This simple technique aligns with the report’s findings: reactions are stronger when the recipient knows the pattern.
SWPS shows another method: an educational game where users play the role of the manipulator. After this experience, people become better at spotting fakes. Results from the study suggest, however, that repeated exposure is needed for a lasting effect. Meanwhile, the SWPS and SGGW team studies awareness of propaganda sources. This method only works in certain conditions. Results don’t automatically repeat, showing how complex social influence processes really are.
COMMERCIAL BREAK
New articles in section Media industry
Children and communication with machines. Experiment by SWPS researchers
SWPS
How do primary school students treat humanoid robots? Researchers from SWPS University have shown that in most cases, children relate to robots politely, and younger children and girls more often perceive them as possessing human characteristics.
Streaming platforms in Poland. What criteria determine the choice
Paweł Sobczak
Price, indicated by 54.2% of respondents, and subject matter (54% of indications) are the most important factors influencing users' choice of content on streaming services. The service brand is mentioned by 18.1% of those surveyed.
Yellow Badge. Jan Bluz's documentary on political prisoners in Belarus
BARD
Imagine writing three posts on a social networking site. For a few clicks on a keyboard, you get three years in a penal colony. Sounds like a grim joke? For political prisoners in Belarus, this is the reality that Jan Bluz shows in the documentary "Yellow Badge", produced with the support of the Pulitzer Center.
See articles on a similar topic:
Hate speech is contagious and leads to harm [EXPERT OPINION]
Karolina Kropiwiec
‘If we are in an environment where certain groups of people are insulted, there is a high probability that we will start using such language ourselves; hate speech is contagious and its consequence is someone's harm,’ says Dr. Michał Bilewicz from the Centre for Research on Prejudice at the University of Warsaw.
Equality and Diversity in Media: European Broadcasting Union Report
KFi
European public media are increasingly focusing on diversity, equality, and inclusion (DEI) as the foundation of their operations. Public broadcasters in Europe are implementing diversity strategies - both in content and within their teams. The findings from the report are clear: although progress is visible, many challenges remain.
Disinformation and Fake News. Experts Discuss Challenges for Journalists
RINF
The pandemic, followed by the war in Ukraine, triggered a massive wave of disinformation in media and social channels. Experts at the Impact’22 Congress in Poznań and the European Economic Congress in Katowice discussed effective strategies to combat disinformation.
Milgram Experiment 2023. AI Can Encourage Violence
KrzysztoF
Researchers from SWPS University replicated the famous Milgram experiment, in which participants were instructed to inflict pain on another person under the authority’s command. This time, the authority was a robot. It’s the first study showing that people are willing to harm another person when a robot commands them to do so.
