
What is the selfish trap technique? Dariusz Doliński, Tomasz Grzyb, and Wojciech Kulesza from SWPS University explain that its effectiveness depends on how the request is made. It should be framed so that individuals who consider themselves intelligent feel compelled to comply. Refusal should make them feel they lack the quality in question.
Even as children, we unknowingly fall into this trap, but adults are just as susceptible. To test this, the researchers conducted two experiments.
Not a Compliment, Nor a Coincidence
In the first experiment, the researchers tried to pressure people into filling out a survey. They used the term "intelligence" because most people see themselves as intelligent, and belief in one’s intellectual abilities is important for self-esteem. The researchers hypothesized that referencing this trait would make people more inclined to agree. The study included 532 participants, both women and men.
- In the first part, the researcher approached individuals at a bus stop, asking them to complete a survey needed for academic credit.
- In the second part, the researcher expanded the request, stating the survey was intended for intelligent people.
In the first part, 174 out of 532 participants (about 33%) agreed to participate. In the second part, 279 participants (over 52%) complied. The difference between these results was statistically significant.
- First, the design of the initial experiment allowed for multiple interpretations, such as seeing it as a compliment. The statement mentioned seeking intelligent people, and the person was implied to be one of them. The second experiment eliminated these doubts, explains Prof. Dariusz Doliński, one of the study authors, in a summary published on SWPS University`s website. - Second, when two experiments with different scenarios yield similar patterns, the researcher gains confidence that it’s not a coincidence. Third, if only the first experiment were conducted, doubts might arise as to whether the technique works only for gaining consent to participate in a survey and not for more significant decisions.
Rationality? We Like to Have It
The next phase of the study tested whether appealing to participants` sense of rationality would be equally compelling. The results were just as clear.
In the first scenario, a car dealership employee called a client, asking if they wanted to schedule a vehicle inspection at an authorized service center. If the client agreed, an appointment was made. In the second scenario, the conversation was identical, but the employee added that studies show rational customers prefer authorized service centers.
In the first scenario, 25 out of 60 participants (about 42%) agreed to the inspection. In the second scenario, 43 out of 60 participants (nearly 72%) agreed. Observing actual behavior, 22 participants (over 36%) from the first group showed up for the inspection, compared to 40 participants (over 66%) in the second group.
Relationship and tech. Study about love in the age of likes 👇
Opportunities and... Risks
The SWPS researchers emphasize that the selfish trap is not inherently unethical. It can be used for positive purposes, such as discouraging harmful habits, adopting healthier routines, or supporting important causes. However, it can also be employed as a manipulation technique.
- For any influence technique, reflection is the best defense. One should avoid acting automatically and instead consider whether the suggestion aligns with their values and personal interests, explains Prof. Doliński in the study’s summary. - If the balance is negative, a response such as "Perhaps some intelligent people do this, but others do not. I belong to the latter group, thank you for the suggestion, but I’ll pass" is sufficient.
The concept of the selfish trap, a new social influence technique not previously described in literature, was presented by SWPS University psychologists Professors Dariusz Doliński, Tomasz Grzyb, and Wojciech Kulesza in the journal Social Influence.
source: SWPS University
COMMERCIAL BREAK
New articles in section Media industry
Television 2025. Report by the European Broadcasting Union
Krzysztof Fiedorek
Europeans are watching less and less television. In 2024, the average viewing time was 3 hours and 13 minutes per day. Only 54% of young people had any contact with TV, and public broadcasters held a 23% share. Television is losing relevance, especially among the youngest viewers.
Mobile games in Poland. Market value and forecasts
Newseria, KFi
In 2030, the number of mobile game users in Poland may exceed 7.1 million, and market revenue will approach 470 million dollars, according to Statista data. As the number of gamers increases, the market for mobile gaming devices is also expanding.
Paid journalistic content. Market trends and forecasts by Reuters Institute
Krzysztof Fiedorek
Only 18 percent of internet users pay for online news access, and the rate has not increased for the third year in a row. Norway sets records with 42%, while Greece does not exceed 7%. Globally, nearly one in three subscribers cancels after a year.
See articles on a similar topic:
Influencers and social video rule information. Digital News Report 2025
Krzysztof Fiedorek
Seconds of vertical clips set the future of news. TikTok, YouTube and an army of influencers pull viewers away from TV sets and newspaper pages. Whoever masters this new pulse seizes not only attention but also control of the story.
Mass Media in Poland
Agnieszka Osińska
Into the decade of years 90. Poland entered with media national, subjected to the political control. Starting from the half of 1989 our media market underwent transformations, biggest probably from the time of the World War II.
Russian Propaganda. Debunk.org Report on Moscow's Disinformation Scale
BARD, PAP Mediaroom
In 2022, the Russian Federation allocated approximately 143 billion rubles to mass media (equivalent to 1.9 billion US dollars), exceeding the planned budget by 25%. For the current year, the Kremlin's budget for this sector is set at 119.2 billion rubles (1.6 billion dollars).
COVID-Skeptics in Media. Dentsu Agency Study
BARD
A significant presence of COVID-skepticism, which downplays the pandemic or focuses on conspiracy theories, accounts for approximately 8% of online content related to the coronavirus. The primary sources of knowledge about COVID-19 and the current situation are the internet, social media, television, and increasingly, family and friends.