
Press freedom, considered a cornerstone of democratic societies, is increasingly under threat. The report "In Record Year, China, Israel, and Myanmar Are World’s Leading Jailers of Journalists," published by the Committee to Protect Journalists (CPJ), provides alarming data on the persecution of journalists worldwide. By the end of 2024, at least 361 journalists were imprisoned globally, reflecting the worsening state of press freedom.
361 Journalists Behind Bars. What Do the Numbers Say?
Data from the CPJ report shows that 2024 recorded the second-highest number in history, following the record-breaking 370 journalists imprisoned in 2022. Despite a slight decrease in the global number of detainees, the situation has worsened in many countries. The worst statistics were reported in China, Israel, and Myanmar, which together account for nearly one-third of global cases.
Rank | Country | Number of Journalists Imprisoned |
---|---|---|
1 | China | 50 |
2 | Israel | 43 |
3 | Myanmar | 35 |
4 | Belarus | 31 |
5 | Russia | 30 |
6 | Egypt | 17 |
7 | Iran | 16 |
7 | Eritrea | 16 |
7 | Vietnam | 16 |
These numbers illustrate the diverse strategies employed by regimes worldwide. In China, accusations of anti-state activities dominate, in Israel, administrative detentions are common, and in Myanmar, journalists often face military tribunals.
China. The World`s Leading Repressor
China remains the top jailer of journalists for yet another year. By the end of 2024, at least 50 media representatives were in Chinese prisons, although CPJ estimates this number could be much higher due to strict information censorship.
Most Notable Cases:
- Sophia Huang Xueqin, a well-known journalist and activist, was sentenced to five years in prison for "inciting subversion of state power."
- Qurban Mamut, former editor of a Uyghur magazine, is serving a 15-year sentence for "political crimes" related to publishing articles on human rights.
China employs an extensive technological surveillance system, monitoring journalists` communications and blocking access to information. In the Xinjiang region, repression against the Uyghur minority has reached new levels, also impacting independent media.
Israel. A Sharp Rise in Arrests
Israel, which a few years ago was not among the leading persecutors of journalists, ranked second in the CPJ list in 2024. A total of 43 journalists were detained there, many of them Palestinians. Most were arrested under administrative laws allowing detention without trial.
Reason for Detention | Number of Cases |
---|---|
Administrative arrests | 15 |
Terrorism-related charges | 20 |
Other | 8 |
Conditions in Israeli prisons leave much to be desired. According to the CPJ report, journalists face degradation and restricted access to legal assistance. Israel also uses legal measures, such as banning Al Jazeera from its territory, to limit coverage of conflicts in the Gaza Strip.
Myanmar. Repression Under Military Rule
Since the 2021 coup, Myanmar has remained among the top nations persecuting journalists. In 2024, 35 media representatives were imprisoned, many convicted under anti-terrorism laws.
Examples of Sentences:
- Shin Daewe, an investigative journalist, was sentenced to life imprisonment for allegedly using a drone, considered an act of terrorism.
- Sai Zaw Thaike, a reporter covering the aftermath of a cyclone, received a 20-year prison sentence for "incitement."
These repressions are part of the junta`s broader strategy to suppress any form of resistance to its rule.
Belarus and Russia. Authoritarianism in Eastern Europe
In Europe, repression of journalists is concentrated in Belarus and Russia. In Belarus, where Alexander Lukashenko’s regime has long used brutal measures against opposition, 31 journalists were imprisoned. In Russia, nearly half of the 30 detainees were Ukrainian journalists imprisoned in territories occupied by Moscow.
Comparison of Repressions:
- Belarus: Journalists are imprisoned for covering protests or working in independent media. Many are convicted on charges of "extremism."
- Russia: Repression affects not only Russian journalists but also those from Crimea and eastern Ukraine. Victims often face military tribunals.
What Lies Ahead?
The outlook for press freedom in the coming years is alarming, but it depends on the actions of the international community, human rights organizations, and governments themselves. Several scenarios and forecasts emerge:
- Increasing Use of Surveillance Technologies
Authoritarian regimes will increasingly use digital technologies such as artificial intelligence, facial recognition systems, and advanced internet surveillance methods to monitor and silence independent voices. Countries like China may export their technological solutions to other states, strengthening global media control. - New Laws Restricting Freedom of Speech
The adoption and reinforcement of anti-cyber, anti-terrorism, or "fake news" laws may be used as tools to penalize independent journalism. This trend is evident in countries like Russia, Egypt, and Bangladesh, with similar regulations potentially emerging elsewhere. - Increased Pressure on Journalists in Conflict Zones
Armed conflicts, such as the war in Ukraine or tensions in the Gaza Strip, will continue to increase the risk of repression against reporters. Journalists covering such events may face both physical and legal attacks. - International Community Response
Human rights organizations such as CPJ or Reporters Without Borders will continue efforts to defend journalists. Diplomatic pressure on regimes violating human rights and the implementation of international sanctions against perpetrators of repression will be critical. - Growing Role of Journalists in Exile
More journalists may choose to work abroad to avoid repression in their own countries. The importance of independent media operating in exile is likely to grow, providing uncensored reporting.
Despite grim predictions, hope lies in advancing technologies enabling anonymous journalism and increasing international awareness of the need to protect press freedom. Much, however, depends on global solidarity and the response of democratic nations to these challenges.
* * *
The report, prepared by the Committee to Protect Journalists (CPJ), presents data on journalists imprisoned for their work as of December 1, 2024. It includes cases confirmed to be related to journalistic activities, excluding missing persons or those held by non-state entities. CPJ applies rigorous criteria based on documentation, reports from local and international organizations, and interviews with victims’ families.
The full material is available for free at https://cpj.org/
COMMERCIAL BREAK
New articles in section Media industry
Paid journalistic content. Market trends and forecasts by Reuters Institute
Krzysztof Fiedorek
Only 18 percent of internet users pay for online news access, and the rate has not increased for the third year in a row. Norway sets records with 42%, while Greece does not exceed 7%. Globally, nearly one in three subscribers cancels after a year.
Gen Alpha avoids tough topics. What young people are really looking for
Krzysztof Fiedorek
Generation Alpha prefers humor in 46% of cases, while only 12% are interested in news and political topics. Young people and children consciously limit what negatively affects their emotions - according to the report "Gen Alpha Unfiltered" published by GWI.
YouTube redefines viewer engagement. Goodbye to returning viewers
KFi
As many as 30% of internet users now turn to YouTube as their main news source, and 65% consume news in video form. Now the platform is shaking things up. Reach still matters, but engagement is what really counts.
See articles on a similar topic:
Influencers Earn Too Much. No Fluff Jobs Report
KrzysztoF
According to nearly 70% of Poles, influencers earn too much, and 54% feel the least affection for them out of all professions. Only politicians receive equally low regard among respondents surveyed by No Fluff Jobs. On the other hand, nurses and… farmers are considered underpaid.
Fake News and Disinformation in Poland. Scale, Impact and Future
Bartłomiej Dwornik
Where do the sources of disinformation lie, and how large is the scale of this wave? Why are we so susceptible to false information, and what role do traditional media play in this puzzle? Let’s shed some light on these issues and face the question: can the battle against the flood of disinformation still be won?
Trust in Public Media in Europe. Report by European Broadcasting Union
Krzysztof Fiedorek
Public media in Europe play a significant role in fostering trust and supporting democracy. The EBU 2024 report examines leaders, major challenges, and the impact of media on society. Polish, Hungarian, and Greek media, with results far below the average, face a crucial question: can trust be rebuilt?
Influencers 2024. Data, Facts, and Stories from the UNESCO Report
Krzysztof Fiedorek
As many as 68% of digital creators are nano-influencers. One in three has experienced hate speech, and over 60% do not thoroughly verify information before publishing. Moreover, only half disclose their content sponsors. The findings from the "Behind The Screens" report are both inspiring and alarming.